| Click for the Finfacts Ireland Portal Homepage |

Finfacts Business News Centre

 Irish Economy
 EU Economy
 US Economy
 UK Economy
 Global Economy
 Asia Economy

Finfacts changes from 2015


How to use our RSS feed

Follow Finfacts on Twitter

Web Finfacts

See Search Box lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.


Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and you are in its business news section.


Finfacts Homepage

Irish Share Prices

Euribor Daily Rates

Global Cost of Living

Irish Tax - Income/Corporate




Content Management by interactivetools.com.

News : Innovation Last Updated: Jan 19, 2015 - 3:01 PM

Ireland: 'Knowledge box' patent tax rate expected to be 5%
By Michael Hennigan, Finfacts founder and editor
Jan 14, 2015 - 8:06 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Ireland: The Department of Finance will publish a consultation document Wednesday on the proposed 'knowledge box' patent tax regime that will be enacted in replacement of the Double Dutch tax avoidance scheme. Late last year Department officials hinted that a 5% rate was under discussion to match the Dutch rate.

The Irish headline corporation tax rate is 12.5%.

Special rates and tax conditions applying to intellectual property (IP) have become popular in recent years and all countries actively seeking FDI (foreign direct investment) will have a regime in coming years but for European Union countries, both the European Commission and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) are due to propose common rules to avoid another battleground for corporate tax avoidance.

Italy introduced IP tax incentives last month.

The evolving regime is one where it will no longer be as simple as using digital accounting transactions to shift IP ownership to low tax or no tax jurisdictions and relevant profits will have to derive from actual research and development (R&D) within a country. The value of trade marks and brands will be excluded.

This is a challenge for Ireland as business R&D is not generally at a level that merits a patent while less than one-third of IDA Ireland's foreign client companies spend any money on research. Israel is the preferred overseas location for American R&D centres.

Last November the UK, which has a preferential rate of 10% compared with the headline rate of 21%, announced an agreement with Germany on  the link between profit and actual research done in a country while rules regarding collaboration between teams in two or more countries have to be agreed.

At the monthly ECOFIN council meeting of EU finance ministers  concerning an amendment of the Parent Subsidiary Directive and the Directive covering the automatic exchange of information, the Netherlands expressed concerns about the definition of intellectual assets and a requirement for patenting.

However, it's unlikely that there would be trust in a certification by an accountancy firm for example as it's already easy to abuse what's classified as R&D and an Irish IP consultant has suggested that the Irish self-assessed 25% R&D tax credit is used more to cut tax bills than promote innovation.

KPMG Netherlands said in a comment following the ECOFIN meeting: "In the report, the Deputy Minister states that for the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises in particular it is important that innovation boxes are not confined to patents, but also that profits arising from activities for which an R&D certificate has been issued (R&D innovations) remain within the innovation box. After all, the process of applying for a patent is often too expensive for SMEs, while they do have more than sufficient ties with the Member State of residence. In this regard, the Netherlands has added a written statement to the minutes of the ECOFIN meeting. In his letter to the Lower House of December 4, 2014, the Deputy Minister had already stated that the Netherlands would also continue to argue strongly within the EU and OECD for the inclusion of R&D innovations in the future innovation box. At the moment, however, it is still uncertain whether it will succeed in this."

Michael Noonan, Irish finance minister, last month said on the Anglo-German agreement on patent boxes that it appeared qualifying for the tax break would be determined by whether a certain percentage of a company's research and development staff worked locally.

"This approach on the one hand fits into Ireland's core value of attracting substance," he said.

"However, on the other hand, I do have concerns that such an approach, if designed too tightly, would have the potential to limit the scope for use by smaller countries.

"Would this represent a fair reform? I don't think so. Further discussion is both planned and necessary."

Replacing the Double Irish with Knowledge Development / Patent Box - Part 2 - looks at business research & development in Ireland

The Department of Finance has opened a 12-week public consultation  on the patent box.

Consultation document [pdf]

Related Articles

© Copyright 2015 by Finfacts.ie

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
Digital Taylorism: Amazon's chief rejects depiction of "soulless, dystopian workplace"
Most surviving startups do not grow; Tiny number powers jobs engine
Despite euro dip China & US remain most competitive manufacturing nations
Business startup rates up in most OECD countries led by Australia and UK
NASA's Kepler mission has confirmed the first near-Earth-size planet
Energy subsidies at 6.5% of global GDP; Commodity prices to remain weak
US startups rely on personal savings, debt; Venture capital funds less than 1%
Europe produces 13 $1bn+ "unicorn" startups in one year; London is Europe's digital capital
Irish-based firms raised €120m in VC funding in Q1 2015; Some top recipients Irish for tax purposes
Ireland: Fourth highest 25-34 year old ratio of third-level graduates in developed world: So what?
Business dynamism/ employer firm startups in US secular decline
Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015: Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Germany are on top
Education systems failing to provide students with skills for success in 21st century
US, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland have best higher education systems
Handbook of Service Innovation: Ireland moving up the value chain?
Switzerland revives silk industry that thrived for two centuries
Sales of Irish tech firms create 300 millionaires in 15 years and no scaleups
Apple warns of 'material' tax payments from EU's Irish tax investigation
Apple earnings surge 33% on higher price and iPhone sales jump in China
Big Pharma's internationalisation of R&D to China
The dangers of romanticising entrepreneurs despite key role
UK and Irish business R&D heavily reliant on foreign-owned firms
Silicon Valley and the development of the silicon microchip - Part 2
Ireland: Innovation with or without R&D/ scientific breakthroughs
UK government most open/ transparent in world; Ireland & Greece lowest ranking in Europe
10 questions about Switzerland's Solar Impulse aircraft – answered
Silicon Valley loses its silicon; Typical household income stagnates - Part 1
21st century skills are 18 century skills + a computer
Growing ICT sector in Europe accounts for 5% of employment
Should Ireland copy Singapore's scientific research investment plan?
Startups vs Scaleups: 4% of UK startups have 10+ employees 10 years later
Irish patent filings at European Patent Office fell in 2014
Facebook's maze of privacy settings maybe in breach of European law
Apple to invest €1.7bn in Irish and Danish data centres
Silicon Valley insider warns of dodgy $1bn valuations of private companies
Israel's Startup Nation not a jobs engine; Nor is Irish high tech
Established industries often beat new technology investment returns
Ireland: Noonan said EU to drop Apple tax case; Now expects court case
Irish R&D Tax Credit: No evidence of rising business innovation; Facts don't matter
Apple reports biggest profit of a public company in history