| Click for the Finfacts Ireland Portal Homepage |

Finfacts Business News Centre

 Irish Economy
 EU Economy
 US Economy
 UK Economy
 Global Economy
 Asia Economy

Finfacts changes from 2015


How to use our RSS feed

Follow Finfacts on Twitter

Web Finfacts

See Search Box lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.


Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and you are in its business news section.


Finfacts Homepage

Irish Share Prices

Euribor Daily Rates

Global Cost of Living

Irish Tax - Income/Corporate




Content Management by interactivetools.com.

News : Innovation Last Updated: Sep 21, 2015 - 2:54 AM

Many high growth firms either fail or fade - Part 1
By Michael Hennigan, Finfacts founder and editor
Jul 23, 2014 - 7:35 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

UK employment and high growth firms

Startups and young companies are responsible for the majority of net annual job creation in the US and other data shows that while high-growth firms in advanced economies make up a small percentage of total firms, they generate up to half of all new jobs and are able to maintain growth during a recession. Because a small number of firms create a huge number of jobs, it is important that policymakers understand more about them. It is also important to note that many of the high growth firms either fail or fade - -  what is key is that new ones replace them.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defines high growth firms as having more than 10 employees at the outset and having at least 50% growth in sales over 3 years, with at least 22% growth in employment.

The OECD says growth firms are found in all industries, not only high tech while and the growth cycle is not always continuous: some declining firms reinvent themselves, some high growth firms go through slower periods of growth.

Anders Hoffmann, a Danish researcher, in a paper [pdf] showed that Europe looks at least as entrepreneurial as the United States if startups are used as the measure of entrepreneurship. However, Hoffman argued that Europe’s biggest challenge is developing more high-growth firms - - UK and Ireland had the lead in high growth firms but Irish data include the significant foreign-owned sector.

Dane Stangler, director of research at the Kauffman Foundation, a leading US entrepreneurship think-tank, has reported [pdf] that just 1% of companies - - those growing the fastest - - generate roughly 40% of new jobs in any given year.

The average company in the US adds two to three jobs per year. The top 1% of firms measured by growth rates add on average 88 jobs per year. A large majority of these companies end up with between 20 and 249 employees, and a fair percentage grow upwards of 2,500 employees.

In the UK, according to Nesta, an innovation think-tank, between 2002 and 2008 just over 50% of all new jobs came from just 6% of firms employing 10 or more people at the start of the period - - see 2014 academic paper.

In the US and UK, high growth firms are not typically in the high tech sector.

Derek Lidow, a professor of entrepreneurship at Princeton University, who was the founder of iSuppli, a business that provides important data to companies to assist them in making informed decisions, which he sold to IHS for $100m in 2010, is the author of a book, 'Startup Leadership' that was published last March [excerpt -- pdf]. He warns that there are not only startup failures but many once acclaimed high growth companies also fail or fade.

Lidow cites statistics from the Kauffman Foundation about Inc. magazine's annual list of the Inc. 5000 fastest growing private companies that lessen it as a full measure of success. "According to the latest Kauffman Foundation analysis, about 63% of Inc. 5000 companies are still in business 5 or more years after making it onto the list. About half of the companies still in business have shrunk from the size they were when they made in onto the list.  Thirty-seven per cent of the Inc. 5000 were sold or went out of business.  Many of the 32% of Inc. 500 entrepreneurs that sold their companies go on to try again, becoming serial entrepreneurs.  This implies that most of the entrepreneurs that sold their companies were not completely satisfied with the outcome.

Undoubtedly a fraction of these Inc. 5000 serial entrepreneurs did well in the sale of their companies yet still wanted to launch another company because they find founding companies exciting.  But the point is that just because an entrepreneur has a company that grows fast doesn't mean that the firm will continue to have even non-negative growth, or, that the entrepreneur will be satisfied with his outcome."

Inc. reported that overall from an analysis of the Inc. 500 lists in 2000-2006, 40 to 50% of companies generated less revenue in 2010 than in the year they made the list, according to Kauffman.

By 2010, just 34 Inc. 500 companies had gone public and remained in business.

Last year Fortune magazine began a piece: "Here’s a quick quiz: No matter whose brand name is on the smartphone or digital camera you’re using now, do you know who invented almost all of the technology in it? This outfit’s scientists came up with digital cameras way back in 1975, and then went on to produce more than 1,000 digital innovations, including the first megapixel sensor of more than 1.4m pixels, the first color filter tray, and the first method of image compression up to JPEG standards. What company was it?"

“Organizations are in greatest danger of failing when they’re at the peak of their success,” Gerard J. Tellis, who teaches management at the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business and directs the Center for Global Innovation there. “Market dominance can be a curse that blinds companies to the next big innovation on the horizon.”

Fortune said his new book, 'Unrelenting Innovation,' looks at exactly how that happens. Tellis and his colleagues studied 770 companies across 15 countries, including many — like Hewlett-Packard , Sony, and General Motors — whose struggles have made headlines. The researchers found that success over the long haul isn’t a matter of size, number of patents, or the dollar amount of R&D investments. Instead, staying on top requires a “culture of innovation,” including an appetite for risk, an eagerness to reward fresh thinking, and a focus on the future, not the past.

The answer to the Fortune quiz was Kodak.

Companies in the forthcoming Inc.500|5000 2014 are ranked according to the percentage growth of their annual revenue over a three-year period. To assess this, we ask for your 2010 and 2013 revenues. This gives us a three-year growth period, using 2010 as a base year for growth.

  • Have generated revenue by March 31, 2010;
  • Have generated at least $100,000 in revenue in 2010;
  • Have generated at least $2m in revenue in 2013;
  • Be privately held, for profit; based in the US, and independent (not a subsidiary or division of another company).

Related Articles

© Copyright 2015 by Finfacts.ie

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
Digital Taylorism: Amazon's chief rejects depiction of "soulless, dystopian workplace"
Most surviving startups do not grow; Tiny number powers jobs engine
Despite euro dip China & US remain most competitive manufacturing nations
Business startup rates up in most OECD countries led by Australia and UK
NASA's Kepler mission has confirmed the first near-Earth-size planet
Energy subsidies at 6.5% of global GDP; Commodity prices to remain weak
US startups rely on personal savings, debt; Venture capital funds less than 1%
Europe produces 13 $1bn+ "unicorn" startups in one year; London is Europe's digital capital
Irish-based firms raised €120m in VC funding in Q1 2015; Some top recipients Irish for tax purposes
Ireland: Fourth highest 25-34 year old ratio of third-level graduates in developed world: So what?
Business dynamism/ employer firm startups in US secular decline
Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015: Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Germany are on top
Education systems failing to provide students with skills for success in 21st century
US, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland have best higher education systems
Handbook of Service Innovation: Ireland moving up the value chain?
Switzerland revives silk industry that thrived for two centuries
Sales of Irish tech firms create 300 millionaires in 15 years and no scaleups
Apple warns of 'material' tax payments from EU's Irish tax investigation
Apple earnings surge 33% on higher price and iPhone sales jump in China
Big Pharma's internationalisation of R&D to China
The dangers of romanticising entrepreneurs despite key role
UK and Irish business R&D heavily reliant on foreign-owned firms
Silicon Valley and the development of the silicon microchip - Part 2
Ireland: Innovation with or without R&D/ scientific breakthroughs
UK government most open/ transparent in world; Ireland & Greece lowest ranking in Europe
10 questions about Switzerland's Solar Impulse aircraft – answered
Silicon Valley loses its silicon; Typical household income stagnates - Part 1
21st century skills are 18 century skills + a computer
Growing ICT sector in Europe accounts for 5% of employment
Should Ireland copy Singapore's scientific research investment plan?
Startups vs Scaleups: 4% of UK startups have 10+ employees 10 years later
Irish patent filings at European Patent Office fell in 2014
Facebook's maze of privacy settings maybe in breach of European law
Apple to invest €1.7bn in Irish and Danish data centres
Silicon Valley insider warns of dodgy $1bn valuations of private companies
Israel's Startup Nation not a jobs engine; Nor is Irish high tech
Established industries often beat new technology investment returns
Ireland: Noonan said EU to drop Apple tax case; Now expects court case
Irish R&D Tax Credit: No evidence of rising business innovation; Facts don't matter
Apple reports biggest profit of a public company in history