The Irish Independent reports that health insurance
premiums will rise by at least €360 per family in the latest crippling blow to
This is because the Government has revealed that legislation will be enacted
in July to charge all those with health insurance for using public hospitals.
Experts say customers will now be hit with a knock-on hike in premiums of at
least 15pc – on top of multiple increases already in the past six months from
Laya, GloHealth, VHI and Aviva.
It means the average premium for a family of two adults and two children has
now doubled in the past three years to around €2,500 a year.
The latest increase could come in within weeks to counter the higher costs
for insurers – leaving families who renew from this autumn being hit with three
hikes in a single year.
The move to charge anyone with private health insurance for treatment in a
public hospital was described by insurers as a "gamechanger" that risks
destroying the health-insurance market.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health confirmed to this newspaper that
legislation to effect the change will be enacted by July 1.
The Government expects to raise €60m this year from the measure and €120m in
a full year.
The move was signalled in last year's Budget, but it was not known how much
of that extra cost would be passed on to customers – nor how quickly it would
come into effect.
The department's spokeswoman said that at the moment half of private patients
who stay overnight in public hospitals do not pay maintenance charges, which are
up to €1,000 a night. A nightly charge of €75 applies for a public hospital.
But insurers said the move to impose the €1,000 charge would mean that even
those who were being treated publicly would find that their insurer was charged
for the stay in hospital.
Dermot Goode, of Healthinsurancesavings.ie, said this would mean a minimum of
15pc hike in premiums this year. This is on top of two increases already in the
past six months from Laya (previously Quinn) and GloHealth, VHI and Aviva. The
rises have been between 18pc and 20pc, he said.
The average premium for a family of two adults and two children has
now doubled in the past three years to around €2,500 year. Around two
million people have health insurance but they are reeling from double-digit
increases this year and average rises of 20pc last year.
Mr Goode said a family on a more expensive plan costing €3,400 a
year would be facing a rise in premiums of €500.
Health chairman Brian Dunne told the
Irish Independent: "Any move to redesignate bed charges will
inevitably and substantially drive up premiums because insurers simply
cannot bear the cost and remain in business. It could well have substantial
implications for the sustainability of the market."
VHI said: "If this goes ahead, it could mean that those with
private health insurance are effectively being asked to pay on the double
for a bed in a public ward – that is, through general taxation and their
private health insurance."
And Catherine Whelan, the chief executive of the Independent
Hospitals Association, which represents 21 private hospitals, said the move
would cause thousands more to give up medical insurance.
She said 200,000 people had given up health insurance in the past
two years, adding that there was a huge risk that private hospitals would be
forced to close if there were fewer insured people in the market.
However, Health Minister James Reilly's spokeswoman called on
insurers to negate the impact of the extra charge by cutting their own
She said: "The minister is determined to address costs in the
sector and has made it clear to the health insurers that significant savings
can be made."
The Irish Independent also reports that
NAMA has accepted an offer that will see it paid less than 25c in the euro in
its first major sale of a portfolio of loans backed by properties in Ireland,
including Garda Headquarters on Harcourt Street.
This means loans will be bought for less than one
quarter of face value.
State-owned NAMA is understood to have agreed
terms to sell the portfolio dubbed Project Aspen to a consortium made up of US
private-equity giant Starwood Capital, Ireland's Key Capital and London-based
The consortium is being advised by developer
David Courtney, who was the original borrower or part of the original borrower
syndicate on the Aspen loans.
He is working for a fee and is not part of the
bid so will not end up owning any of the properties following a sale, people
involved said. Borrowers are banned from buying their own debts from NAMA.
The loans have a face value of €810m but are
being sold for €200m.
A spokesman for NAMA declined to comment,
however, sources close to the deal say it is now moving towards closing with the
Starwood-led consortium as preferred bidder after edging out US bond giant
The loans are linked to development projects put
together by Mr Courtney of real-estate agency Spain, Courtney, Doyle.
He was a significant player in commercial
property during the boom and Project Aspen is backed by a mix of offices and
Loans secured on Harcourt Street Garda station in
Dublin city centre are among the mix. The property is rented to the gardai.
There are also a number of Superquinn units in
Mr Courtney was part of a consortium that bought
the Superquinn group for €450m back in 2005.
The company went into receivership in 2011 and
was subsequently bought by Musgrave.
Project Aspen is the first domestic-loan
portfolio to be sold by NAMA. It was put on the market in January, along with
the smaller Project Club portfolio of loans with a face value of €350m
The sale of Project Aspen has been managed by US
investment bank Eastdil Secured, a unit of US bank Wells Fargo.
Property advisers CBRE will run the Project
NAMA expects to sell €3bn to €3.5bn of
assets this year, as the agency moves ahead with the sale of two major
portfolios of property loans.
The Irish Times reports that
President Michael D Higgins has intervened directly in political debate on the
euro zone debt crisis, criticising the response of European leaders and the
actions of the European Central Bank. In some of his most forthright public
remarks since taking office, Mr Higgins said the introduction of jointly-issued
eurobonds could create scope to boost the economic recovery.
He also took issue with the failure of EU
leaders to fulfil their pledge almost one year ago to break the link between
bank and sovereign debt.
“It would have been of immense benefit
naturally to growth, employment creation and investment if the ... commitment of
separating banking debt from sovereign debt had in fact been implemented,” Mr
Higgins told the Financial Times in an interview. “It would give you the
opportunity to breathe and create growth in the economy.”
Mr Higgins’ remarks put him at odds with
the response to the crisis of the German government, which has largely set the
parameters for other member states.
The Merkel administration has faced down
numerous demands for the joint issuance of sovereign debt and it is in the
vanguard of the countries which are resisting demands for the ESM bailout fund
to retrospectively compensate bailout recipients for taking on historic banking
losses. Stating that Europe faced a “moral crisis” as much as an economic
crisis, the President said European leaders needed to make up their minds on the
type of union they really wanted. There was a need for “radical economics” and a
“radical rethink” of how EU leaders were handling the economic crisis, he said.
The President’s concerns about the crisis
in Europe are well known.
In a speech to the European Parliament two
weeks ago, he said Europe’s citizens were threatened with an unconscious drift
to disharmony, a loss of social cohesion and a deficit of democratic
While he called then for the idealism,
intellectual strength and moral courage that drove Europe’s founding fathers to
be reasserted, he went further in his interview by directly tackling some of the
most difficult policy questions faced by EU leaders. He also questioned Europe’s
basic economic model, saying there was a requirement for a multi-layered
“There is a real problem in what was
assumed to be a single hegemonic model,” he said. “The unemployment profile in
Greece is different from the unemployment profile in Ireland. You need a
pluralism of approaches.”
Adding his voice to the fractious debate
over the mandate of the ECB, the president said the Frankfurt-based central bank
should act to fuel economic growth. Ireland was unusual in its acceptance of
such a high degree of cuts when compared to other euro zone countries, he
“The polite version is that we are
pragmatists,” Mr Higgins said. “What we really need now is something that goes
beyond outrage and recrimination.”
The Irish Times also reports that
declarations made by Google to a House of Commons inquiry that advertising sales
are handled by Dublin-based staff have been brought into serious question,
following allegations that much of the work is done by the company’s London
Last night, the Commons’ Public Accounts
Committee announced that it will demand that a senior Google executive and the
company’s auditors, Ernst & Young, return before them to clarify evidence that
they gave on the issue late last year. Following months of inquiry, Reuters last
night reported that it has found that many of the staff involved in closing
advertising deals are based in London, which, if confirmed, could see Google
facing millions in extra taxation from British tax authorities.
Last November, Google executive Matt
Brittin told MPs: “Everybody who buys advertising from Google [in the UK] –
because that is how we make our money – buys advertising from Google in
Last night, Google denied that it had
misled MPs, saying the London-based staff are “digital consultants” who do not
handle sales contracts, though advertisers have told Google that they never deal
with anyone in the company’s Dublin offices. Two years ago, the internet search
engine giant paid £6 million in tax to the UK taxman on the £395 million it
declared in UK revenue. Between 2006 and 2011, the company generated £11.5
billion in the UK, yet paid £10.3 million in tax, it has been reported.
“We will need to very quickly call back the
Google executives to give them a chance to explain themselves and to ensure that
actually what they told us first time around is not being economical with the
truth,” said the chair of the Commons’ PAC committee, Margaret Hodge.
Ernst & Young, meanwhile, will be
challenged to back up its statement to MPs that they had made their own checks
on Google’s London operations: ”The evidence they gave was clear and
unambiguous,” Mrs Hodge declared pointedly last night.
Facing detailed questioning from Mrs Hodge
last November, Mr Brittin insisted that “anybody who buys advertising from us in
Europe buys from Google in Ireland from our expert team”, even if the are
“encouraged” to do so by London staff.
“Nobody [in the UK] is selling or promoting
the products, but they are definitely encouraging people to spend money on
Google. No one is buying from them,” he told the Labour chair of the influential
The Irish Examiner reports that it looks as if the
stress tests of the Irish banks will be conducted later this year before the
country exits the EU/IMF bailout programme in November.
The last round of stress tests carried out in March 2011 found that an extra
€24bn in capital was needed for the three pillar banks.
Preliminary planning and discussions have now begun on the next set of stress
tests. One view is that the Irish economy needs three functioning banks.
Consequently, if there is a capital shortfall following the stress tests, the
next step should be to quantify how much capital is needed and go about raising
that amount either from private sources or through an EU fund.
However, the other view is that the Irish banks already have very aggressive
provisions in place. Therefore, if more capital is needed then questions should
be asked about that bank’s future.
Bank of Ireland is 15% owned by the State and the closest to returning to
profitability and making a full return to private ownership. But AIB and
Permanent TSB are both 99.8% state-owned. Permanent TSB has submitted a
restructuring plan to the European Commission that would see it split into a
good bank and bad bank with a separate division for its British business. It
faces the biggest challenges among the domestic banks in returning to
profitability and carving out a viable future. One of the views being put
forward is that, if Permanent TSB needed capital, then it should be turned into
a bad bank. Its good assets could be transferred to one of the other banks. It
would then be used as a rundown bank for the troubled assets of Bank of Ireland
The benefits of this approach is that the capital requirement for a rundown bank
is only 4% whereas the minimum core tier one capital for AIB and Bank of Ireland
is 12%. Consequently the cost of capital would be much cheaper to manage a much
greater amount of assets. Moreover, Bank of Ireland and AIB, free of troubled
assets would return to profitability much quicker and would be much more
beneficial for the wider economy.
However, there would be huge issues around the transfer of assets and how much
PTSB would pay for these assets and whether it was compatible with EU state aid
rules. Moreover, it is not certain the Government would want another bad bank
following the liquidation of IBRC.
Also, it is thought the European Commission wants PTSB as a third force in Irish
banking. According to one source nothing has been decided and the Central Bank
has not developed any policy on this issue. The Central Bank declined to
Check out our
, at a low annual charge of €25 - - if
you are a regular user of Finfacts, 50 euro cent a week is hardly a huge ask to
support the service.