See Search Box
lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be
the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that
developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.
Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and
you are in its business news section.
In response to the stalemate in Washington DC
on the federal debt limit and how to cut the annual budget deficit, Moody’s, the
credit rating agency, said on Thursday that a review of the credit rating of the
United States was “likely” in July, given that
“the risk of continuing stalemate has grown.”
Morgan Stanley, the US investment bank,
says: "on the spending side, healthcare costs have been exploding and are on a path
to grow even more rapidly in coming decades. Indeed, under current policies,
the CBO estimates that federal government spending, excluding interest on the
debt, will amount to nearly 30% of GDP by the middle of this century. While the
numbers appear to provide a relatively straightforward indication of where cuts
might be needed, the situation becomes much more complicated when political
factors enter into the equation.
For example, a recent ABC News/Washington
Post poll found that 78% of respondents oppose any cuts whatsoever in
Medicare. Other polls on this topic have reported similar results. And, after
apparently getting an earful from their constituents while they were home for
Easter recess, Republicans already appear to be backing away from the dramatic
cuts in healthcare spending contained in Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan's
Meanwhile, on the tax side of the ledger, revenues have tended to fluctuate
around 18% to 20% of GDP over the past 50 years or so. Of course, revenues are
now well below historical norms because of the recession and prior tax cuts.
But, even if ALL of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts expire at the end of 2012
(as currently scheduled), the payroll tax cut expires at the end of 2011 (as
currently scheduled) and the economy achieves full employment, the CBO
(Congressional Budget Office) estimates
that revenues will only be around 21% of GDP by 2020. So, we are facing a
long-term structural deficit of 10% of GDP or more (after factoring in interest
costs). This is the basic arithmetic that points to an unsustainable situation
over the long run."
Dr. Peter Morici: Lessons from Eurozone for
the United States; Greece’s finances are out of control. Its bonds are
downgraded to junk; and without a German and European Central Bank bailout, it
will be forced to restructure its debt.
Greece doesn’t have a liquidity problem—it is insolvent—because no amount of
spending cuts or tax increases can cure its budget woes. Investors are demanding
such high premiums on outstanding bonds that rolling over debt, as those come
due, will be prohibitively expensive.
German and European banks would take huge haircuts in a restructuring;
therefore, to avoid immediate pain, the Germans and ECB may find a way to buy
more Greek bonds. This would continue the charade that Athens can find a path to
solvency through economic reforms and austerity but the longer this folly
persists, the greater the haircut for Athens’ creditors.
The United States is losing control of its finances too, and bond rating
agencies have threatened to downgrade its debt.
Like Greece, health care and retirement programs are spinning out of control;
and Congress has padded the federal payrolls with new programs and bureaucrats
that slow, rather foster, growth.
President Obama and principal US creditors—most notably, China—are in denial.
The President talks about raising taxes on families earning more than $250,000
but that will hardly dent the problem.
Substantial spending cuts or higher taxes would suffocate the economic recovery,
and a second credit crisis and deeper recession would likely cause chaos for
China’s exporters and banks. Hence, Beijing continues to print yuan to buy
dollars, convert those dollars to US bonds, and suffer rising inflation when
those yuan return to purchase Chinese exports.
Eventually, the United States will be insolvent too, the global economy will
shatter, and American sovereignty will be thrown into the arms of Chinese
Europe’s Outsized Expectations for Public Benefits
European voters expect a strong, broad and expensive social safety net—including
universal health care, income security and early retirement.
These have so reduced individual risks and rewards that population and economic
growth have slowed to dangerously low rates. Without more young people and a
bigger economic pie to divide, the social safety net is too expensive to
maintain in rich and poor countries alike.
With the commercial integration that followed World War II through the European
Common Market, composed initially of six nations, and the broader European Free
Trade Area, which encompassed most of the non-communist states, public
expectations for benefits in poorer nations and regions, like Portugal, Greece
and southern Italy, grew to rival those in richer states. This despite the fact
their economies lacked the resources to pay for those benefits, even more
acutely than in Germany or France.
Politicians in the South responded by expanding and enriching social safety nets
but costs rose too, as doctors, teachers and the like expected salaries and
benefits more comparable to their colleagues further north.
The price tag outran the ability of employers and governments to pay, and
inflation and national budget headaches followed.
Until the euro was adopted in 1999, southern nations could let their national
currencies gradually fall in value against the German mark and other currencies
of richer nations.
That would boost exports and tax revenues. The pensions paid by Greece, Portugal
and others, denominated in their national currencies, became worth less if spent
in Germany and other northern jurisdictions; however, these Mediterranean states
became great places for northern Europeans and Americans to retire and vacation.
After 1999, national governments in Spain, Portugal and Greece, and to a lesser
extent more prosperous Italy, faced the difficult prospect of telling their
citizens they could not retire as young, enjoy the same health benefits or
employment security as the wealthier French, Germans and Dutch.
Instead, these governments borrowed heavily and now face severe retrenchment and
The austerity Germany and others will ultimately compel to bail out these
floundering governments will shatter the myth that the welfare state can be
provided equally across Europe, or Mediterranean states will simply quit the
euro and take with them the Franco-German dream of European Unity.
Before Americans and northern Europeans chasten their Mediterranean friends too
harshly for living beyond their means, remember northern reluctance to share
wealth through a strong central government has much to do with their
In the United States, the states can’t print money and some spend more
aggressively than others but most social benefits are substantially assisted by
Washington, which can tax New York to subsidize Mississippi. Brussels cannot tax
Germany to help pay for Greek social benefits, at least not as aggressively as
German and other northern European exporters greatly benefit from a single
European market, and the fact that the euro is overvalued for its Mediterranean
economies but undervalued for their exports. However, unless the Germans and
others are willing to let Brussels tax them as necessary to reasonably equalize
social spending between richer and poorer states, the euro will remain an
uncertain adventure and European unity a utopian dream.
Monetary union is simply not possible without fiscal union.
The Threat of Contagion and the Future of the Euro
Greece could be the next Lehman Brothers.
Portugal, Spain and several other countries have similarly shaky finances, and a
Greek restructuring could cause investors to demand much higher risk premiums on
their existing bonds. Rolling over debt would become too expensive, and those
nations could become insolvent too.
European banks, including those in Germany and other wealthy jurisdictions, hold
sizeable amounts of threatened countries’ debt, and US banks hold a lot of
European debt too. A banking crisis could easily spread across Europe and then
to the United States, much as the recent US mortgage and broader financial
crisis spread to Europe.
As the crisis in Greece and other countries worsened, ECB could step up
purchases of sovereign debt but that would simply replace Greek and other
sovereign debt withbns of new euro in circulation and inflation.
At the end of the day—the combination of existing debt and public expectation
for a generous social safety net may compel Germany and other richer countries
to choose between Greece and other poorer countries quitting the euro—returning
to their own currencies—or a combination of high inflation and greater fiscal
union in the EU. Regarding the latter, either the North subsidies the South
through ECB printing euro and inflation, or the EU transfers tax revenues from
richer to poorer countries.
The Germans rightly fear hyper-inflation, but granting the EU broad taxing
authority to finance a pan-EU social safety net is unlikely. Instead, countries
like Greece may be forced to leave the euro zone or the euro will disappear all
This could take several years to play out, but monetary union is simply not
possible without fiscal union.
Lessons for the United States
The US government and many states face similar difficulties but for the fact
that the United States prints dollars—the global currency—but that could change.
The budget published by the Obama Administration assumes GDP growth of about 4%
for 2011 through 2015, even though most private economists believe less is
It contains the politically less difficult fiscal levers—repeal of the Bush tax
cuts for families earning over $250,000 and cuts in defense spending—and
projected revenues and cost savings from the 2010 health care law, including the
new interest and dividend tax.
More realistic assumptions about growth and the cost of health care put US
projected deficits on the path to unsustainability—more than $1trn a year for
Congressional Republicans are throwing around grand numbers—demanding $2trn in
spending cuts to approve an increase in the debt ceiling. But how those cuts are
to be accomplished remains vague, and those come to only about $200bn a year.
Simply, the GOP plan would just boot the problem past the 2012 elections.
At that point, the United States would almost certainly face a downgrade in its
bond rating, higher borrowing costs, forced reductions in spending, and
significant new taxes.
The Democrats have the value added tax waiting in the wings. However, in the
current environment of fiscal indiscipline, a VAT would be a disaster.
The polemic is appealing. Other industrialized countries have one, now that US
social benefits are more like theirs with the passage of national health care,
the United States should have one too?
Not so fast.
Europeans pay a VAT and have income and corporate taxes too but they pay little
for health care and higher education—the government uses those taxes to pick up
With a VAT, US businesses and individual taxpayers would have tax burdens
comparable to Europeans but would still face hefty bills for private health
insurance and college tuition that Europeans do not bear.
The reason is simple. Americans pay 50% higher prices for health care services
than the Germans and most other Europeans, and US universities are chronically
wasteful institutions. And US regulatory costs are higher—witness how Initial
Public Offerings are fleeing the United States for Europe and other venues,
because of higher costs imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley accounting law.
Obama Care contains firm commitments about scope of coverage and benefits
guaranteed each citizen, but offers only vague commitments to reduce higher US
drug, medical professional fees, administrative costs, and malpractice expenses.
US governments, federal and state, pay for about half of US health care
expenses, and a VAT would take away the pressure to chisel down higher US costs.
US higher education is another big hole in household and state finances.
Americans pay too much for what they get, except perhaps from their most modest
institutions—community colleges. Too many young Americans are simply unprepared
to compete in the global economy.
A VAT, without offsetting reductions in personal and corporate taxes, will only
make Americans poorer and with even fewer incentives to work and innovate than
the Europeans, cause businesses to offshore even more jobs and tax economic
growth to anemic levels.
Without a VAT and absent real and substantial cost cutting for health care and
provision of other public services, budget deficits will drive up US borrowing
costs to unmanageable levels.
With a VAT and no real cost cutting, the absence of growth will strangle
American prosperity, cause the collapse of the dollar standard and throw the
United States on the mercy of its principal creditors—read China.
Greece is a warning to governments that promise too much and pay too much for
what they promise.
Clashing Over the Debt Ceiling:
Greece is The World's Second Lehman Brothers: Peter Morici, professor from University of Maryland argues that despite the hefty debt problems in Greece, it'd be a huge mistake if the EU didn't provide a bailout for the country:
Professor, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland,