|
Section 2: The
Policy Context of Asset Sales
|
|
1. |
Any programme of asset disposal should be
assessed from the standpoint of its contribution to long-term economic
recovery. The Group cautions against any actions which enhance
short-term asset disposal prices at the cost of damage to the economy’s
long-run competitiveness, including specifically any failures to
maximise the potential for competition or any value-enhancement of
privatised entities through weak regulatory arrangements.
|
|
2. |
Any privatisation legislation involving
companies operating critical infrastructures in Ireland should include
explicit provision for resolution or step-in powers. The United Kingdom
rules provide a possible template.
|
|
Section 3: Market
Design and Regulatory Reform
|
|
3. |
The objectives of economic regulatory
agencies need to incorporate, explicitly and on a common basis, the
minimisation of cost to the rest of the economy.
|
|
4. |
A comprehensive review of the legislation
governing economic regulatory agencies should be undertaken and
necessary legislative amendments enacted prior to any state disposals.
|
|
5. |
The Department of Enterprise, Trade and
Innovation, which already has responsibility for competition policy,
should become the parent department for all economic regulatory bodies,
and should take responsibility for their supervision and performance
measurement and for legislative updating.
|
|
6. |
Levies on regulated entities, including
license fees and other miscellaneous charges, should accrue directly to
the Exchequer, and, in order to strengthen their independent role, the
operating budgets of economic regulatory bodies should be a charge on
the Central Fund.
|
|
7. |
Central government departments responsible
for policy in areas such as energy and transport should ensure that
adequate internal resources are made available for the task and should
avoid excessive reliance on regulatory agencies and outside consultants.
|
|
8. |
Economic regulators should be relieved of
responsibility for extraneous administrative functions.
|
|
9. |
There should be a single regulator for the
broadcasting and telecommunications (including postal) industries.
|
|
10. |
The Health Insurance
Authority should be absorbed by the Financial Regulator.
|
|
11. |
In the event that a customer-financed water
industry structure emerges, this monopoly should be regulated through
expanding the role of the Commission for Energy Regulation rather than
through the establishment of yet another sector regulator.
|
|
12. |
A comparison should be undertaken of pay and
conditions in all commercial state companies with those elsewhere in the
Irish labour market and in competitor countries, in particular in the
UK, in order to assure that the cost structures in these companies are
competitive with their counterparts. The outcome of this review should
determine the approach of economic regulators to costs allowable in
tariff determination.
|
|
13. |
Sector regulators should seek explicit
justification of mass market advertising budgets from regulated
monopolies and should disallow from cost recovery any element they deem
commercially unnecessary.
|
|
14. |
The legislation governing economic
regulatory bodies should permit them to grandparent certain regulatory
provisions for pre-existing operators when regulatory policy changes.
|
|
Section 4: The
Commercial State Companies in Aggregate
|
|
15. |
The regular payment of a reasonable dividend
to the shareholder is good practice and a performance regulator. The
Group recommends that a dividend of at least 30% of profits should be
paid each year except in the most unusual circumstances.
|
|
16. |
The exercise of the shareholder function in
all state commercial companies should be centralised in a specialised
unit located in the Department of Finance. This unit should also take
responsibility for whatever asset disposal programme is decided on by
Government.
|
|
Section 5: The
Policy Framework for State Energy Companies
|
|
17. |
Policymakers and the regulator should
facilitate the development of gas storage capacity in Ireland on a
commercial basis.
|
|
18. |
If security of supply is the goal,
policymakers and the regulator should facilitate the development of
liquefied natural gas importation capacity in Ireland on a commercial
basis.
|
|
19. |
Carbon emission targets should be pursued on
a least-cost basis and current targets for wind penetration in power
generation should be revised downwards in the context of the adequacy of
existing capacity, the diminished prospects for demand growth and the
altered outlook for gas supplies and prices.
|
|
20. |
An early review, before divestment, should
be undertaken of the system of energy regulation in Ireland.
|
|
Section 6:
Electricity Supply Board (ESB) |
|
21. |
The transmission grid, including the
high-voltage system in Northern Ireland, should be transferred to
EirGrid and retained in public ownership as a regulated monopoly. The
transfer prices for these assets should reflect their regulated asset
valuations. The Review Group notes that unbundling is not an end in
itself but a policy designed to increase competition and efficiency in
the industry.
|
|
22. |
All hydro units should be transferred to
EirGrid and should be operated by them as regulated assets.
|
|
23. |
ESB should be required to dispose of further
generating capacity in Ireland, the units to be sold to be selected by
the CER. This should happen regardless of any ESB ownership decision. No
acquirer should be permitted to bid for capacity which would bring its
Irish market presence above approximately 2,000MW. There should be no
regulatory inhibition to generators owning supply businesses, subject to
competition law.
|
|
24. |
ESB’s energy supply business, electricity
distribution business, generation assets (after some divestment),
international investment, and consulting and engineering businesses
should be sold as a single entity.
|
|
25. |
Should ESB be retained in state ownership,
the Group recommends that, in order to assist in deleveraging the state
balance sheet, all of its overseas interests should be disposed of and
there be no further expansion outside the island of Ireland.
|
|
Section 7: EirGrid
and the High-Voltage Electricity Transmission Grid
|
|
26. |
The Group recommends that EirGrid’s Grid25
targets be re-considered in the light of demand developments and the
Group’s recommendations regarding reduced wind penetration.
|
|
Section 8: Bord Gáis
Éireann and Gas Industry Structure
|
|
27. |
The Group recommends that BGÉ’s regulated
transmission and interconnector assets should be retained in state
ownership. Consideration should be given to the establishment of a
distinct state body to own and operate these assets and also to the
option of merging these operations into EirGrid.
|
|
28. |
The Group recommends that the remaining
operations of BGÉ, other than gas transmission and interconnection, be
privatised as a single entity.
|
|
Section 9: Seaports
and Port Industry Structure
|
|
29. |
The state-owned ports, including Rosslare,
should be restructured into several competing multi-port companies,
built around Dublin, Cork and Shannon Foynes. The Competition Authority
should be consulted concerning the amalgamation process.
|
|
30. |
Privatisation of some or all of the ports
should be considered, ideally after the recommended restructuring. The
adequacy of competition in the sector on an all-Ireland basis should be
reviewed prior to privatisation and suitable regulatory arrangements
instituted, if deemed necessary.
|
|
Section 10: Bord na
Móna
|
|
31. |
The Group recommends that the Government
should seek to dispose of Bord na Móna as a single entity, including
peat extraction rights but not ownership of the peat lands.
|
|
Section 11: Coillte
Teoranta
|
|
32. |
The state should initiate the disposal of
Coillte’s forest and non-forest assets (but not its forest land),
possibly using the New Zealand Crown Forest Licence template modified to
make it suitable to Irish conditions. Unforested land surplus to
Coillte’s requirements should be sold and the proceeds remitted to the
Exchequer by way of special dividend.
|
|
33. |
The replanting obligation attached to
Coillte and grant-aided forestry should be discontinued.
|
|
34. |
In order to minimise the national cost of
climate policy, activities that sequester carbon should be treated
equally to those that emit carbon. The Group supports efforts to reward
forest owners for the value of carbon sequestered by new forests after
2013. For farmers in receipt of the current range of financial
incentives, the Group recommends that these incentives be restructured
to explicitly reward the carbon sequestration value but there is no
justification for a further increase in these payments.
|
|
Section 12: State
Airports
and Aer Lingus
|
|
35. |
As an exception to its general
recommendation on dividend policy, the Review Group recommends that no
dividend be sought from DAA for the present.
|
|
36. |
The DAA should dispose of its non-core
assets, primarily overseas, as a means of substantially reducing its
debt exposure. The timing of this deleveraging programme should be
determined by the company board. In due course, privatisation of the
airports should be considered.
|
|
37. |
Whether DAA’s airport assets are privatised
or retained in state ownership, the regulatory arrangements need to be
reviewed and in particular the scope for political intervention in
capital investment decisions curtailed.
|
|
38. |
The state’s shares in Aer Lingus should be
disposed of as soon as is opportune.
|
|
Section 13: The
Irish Aviation Authority
|
|
39. |
The Government should explore the
possibility of merging Irish air navigation operations with NATS and
possibly other North-West European services. In the event of a merger,
the state’s share should be disposed of for the benefit of the
Exchequer.
|
|
Section 14: Coras
Iompair Éirean (CIE)
|
|
40. |
CIE’s tours business, Rosslare port,
Expressway and other bus businesses competing directly with private
operators should be disposed of. Policy should seek to limit the level
of public subsidy through greater efficiency and the amount of capital
to be invested in further transport projects should be severely
constrained.
The Review Group recommends that the privatisation of all or
part of Dublin Bus should be considered in due course, but only after
government has decided on a model for competition in the Dublin bus
market.
|
|
Section 15: Public
Service Broadcasters (RTÉ and TG4)
|
|
41. |
The portion of the license fee allocated to
the Broadcasting Fund, currently just 7%, should be increased
substantially, in order to better equalise conditions of competition
between RTÉ and private broadcasters.
|
|
42. |
In the interests of transparency, the Group
recommends that RTÉ’s provision of Irish language content to TG4 under
the provisions of the Broadcasting Acts is transacted on a commercial
basis, and funded by TG4 from within its revenues. The respective
Exchequer support of each broadcaster should be adjusted accordingly to
take account of the transaction.
|
|
43. |
RTÉNL should be disposed of as a regulated
entity with appropriate safeguards in place to ensure its availability
to the state and fitness for purpose in the event of a national
emergency.
|
|
44. |
In line with the position taken by the Group
generally on allocation of radio frequency spectrum, the Group
recommends that rights to use spectrum for broadcasting purposes are
allocated using a market-based approach that promotes the most efficient
management and use of the spectrum resource.
|
|
Section 16: An Post
and the Postal Market
|
|
45. |
The grant of a new seven year licence to
operate the National Lottery should be the subject of an open
competition.
|
|
46. |
The Group does not consider that An Post is
a ready candidate for asset disposal in the near term. Instead, the
focus of management must be on ensuring a sustainable future for the
company through cost containment.
|
|
Section 17: Irish
National Stud, Horse Racing Ireland, Bord na gCon
|
|
47. |
The National Stud
should be disposed of.
|
|
48. |
HRI should dispose of its racecourse
interests if commercially satisfactory terms become available.
|
|
49. |
Bord na gCon should dispose of its interests
in greyhound tracks if commercially satisfactory terms become available.
|
|
50. |
HRI and Bord na gCon should dispose of their
Tote interests if commercially satisfactory terms become available.
|
|
Section 18: Asset
Management in Certain non-Commercial Sectors
|
|
51. |
The Group reiterates the proposal of the
Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes that
there should be one state property management agency and a consolidated
register of all state property howsoever owned.
|
|
52. |
The Group recommends that an annual target
should be set for sales of state property over each of the next five
years and the responsibility for this should be given to a single
agency.
|
|
53. |
The Group recommends that a study should be
completed as soon as is practicable on the means and feasibility of
privatising the operations, but not the ownership, of bodies such as the
Property Registration Authority.
|
|
Section 19: The
State’s Intangible Assets
|
|
54. |
The Review Group recommends the introduction
of auctioning of quotas into Irish fisheries policy as part of the
forthcoming reform of the Common Fisheries Policy.
|
|
55. |
The Group is firmly of the view that if the
granting of licences or allocation of rights or quotas confers
substantial market rights, the process should involve a transparent
market auction. This is the only way to secure market value for the
state without controversy. For all other cases, fees should be charged
to cover administrative costs, at least.
|