| Click for the Finfacts Ireland Portal Homepage |

Finfacts Business News Centre

 Irish Economy
 EU Economy
 US Economy
 UK Economy
 Global Economy
 Asia Economy


How to use our RSS feed

Follow Finfacts on Twitter

Web Finfacts

See Search Box lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.


Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and you are in its business news section.


Finfacts Homepage

Irish Share Prices

Euribor Daily Rates

Irish Economy

Global Income Per Capita

Global Cost of Living

Irish Tax - Income/Corporate

Global News

Bloomberg News

CNN Money

Cnet Tech News


Irish Independent

Irish Times

Irish Examiner

New York Times

Financial Times

Technology News




Content Management by interactivetools.com.

News : Irish Last Updated: Mar 2, 2011 - 4:16 AM

Independent report shows FF/PD governments ignored timid warnings of Ireland's Department of Finance
By Michael Hennigan, Founder and Editor of Finfacts
Mar 1, 2011 - 3:38 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

An independent panel's report shows that the Fianna Fáil/ Progressive Democrat (FF/PD) governments headed by Bertie Ahern as taoiseach, ignored the timid warnings of Ireland's Department of Finance over a period of 10 years.

The Irish Times reported on Jan 28, 2011 that former Taoiseach Bertie Ahern regretted that he did not succeed in having “a proper, national infrastructural stadium” while he was in office.

On his last full day in Dáil Éireann, Ahern told RTÉ he wished that “somebody, somewhere” had told him about the developing crisis in the Irish banking system while he was in office.

He said he had lots of regrets about different things. “I still think we didn’t get a proper, national infrastructural stadium, and I think unfortunately when I see little countries like Qatar and Kuwait . . . talking about their 10 stadiums and we never succeeded in getting one national stadium. That’s an achievement I tried hard to do but I didn’t get.”

“I would have loved if somebody, somewhere had of told me what was going on in the banks in this country but nobody ever did. You get wise after the event,” the discredited boom cheerleader said.

In July 2007 in Bundoran, Co. Donegal, with the approval of trade unionists, Ahern rounded on critics of his bubble economy: "Sitting on the sidelines, cribbing and moaning is a lost opportunity. I don't know how people who engage in that don't commit suicide because frankly the only thing that motivates me is being able to actively change something." 

The Minister for Finance, Brian Lenihan TD, today welcomed the report of the Independent Review Panel, chaired by Rob Wright: Strengthening the Capacity of the Department of Finance (pdf). The Minister appointed the Review Panel to assess the Department’s performance over the past 10 years and, based on the lessons drawn from that assessment, to make recommendations for the future development, structure and resourcing of the Department.

In publishing the report, the Minister stated:
“I welcome the Panel’s report. It provides a very fair and thoughtful assessment of the Department’s performance over the past ten years. While a number of recommendations are matters for the new Government and require further consideration, a significant number relate to organisation, skills set and work practices  --  many of which are being implemented without delay. The implementation of these proposals will assist the Department in taking on the complex challenges arising in the coming years. I have no doubt but that the Department will address the issues highlighted in the report with vigour and enthusiasm.”

Rob Wright, the chairman of the group has 35 years of economic policy and management experience in the public service of Canada, over twenty years of which was at the Deputy Minister (Secretary General) level, most recently as Deputy Minister of Finance.

The report says the department did not identify the risks to the tax system that arose from the very active tax agenda of the Government in the period since 1999 and the tax commitments in the 2002 Programme for Government were “effective political messages for the electorate but not good tax policy.” An analysis of the risks involved “should have been provided and communicated forcefully to the Minister for Finance and the Government.”

The authors says a failure by the department to pay sufficient attention to the broader macro-economic risks for Ireland during the period may in part have been due to a shortage of highly-trained economists and financial market experts on the department’s staff.

Given the ignorant short-termism of Fianna Fáil and Progressive Democrat politicians, any decibel level was unlikely to matter.

Besides, Department of Finance staff took the benchmarking payments even though they knew that they were contrary to the recommendations of the body that produced the first report.

It simply paid to go with the flow; nobody did what would have been bizarre in Ireland  - - resign on an issue of principle.

The report makes the following summary points:

Despite predictions to the contrary, the Irish economy continued to grow substantially after 2000. However, the dynamic fundamentally changed. Exports no longer contributed significantly to growth, which was now driven by domestic developments, notably investment in building.

Participation in EMU left interest rates too low for Irish circumstances. This fuelled the property boom as did financial market competition and interbank borrowing from Europe.

Meanwhile, Irish competitiveness had deteriorated very significantly. The property bubble began to collapse from 2007 and the fallout was exacerbated by a significant deterioration in the external environment. The economic and fiscal challenge was, of course, severely aggravated by the failure of the Irish banking system.

Generally speaking, we found that advice prepared by the Department for Cabinet did provide clear warnings on the risks of pro-cyclical fiscal action. These views were signed-off by the Finance Ministers of the day who would submit the Memoranda to Cabinet. The Department’s advice was more direct and comprehensive than concerns expressed by others in Ireland, or by international agencies. With very few exceptions, however the quantum of spending and tax relief outlined in December Budgets was very substantially above that advocated by the Department and Minister in June.

We see three key reasons for this failure of fiscal policy. First, there were extraordinary expectations of Government in Ireland to create spending and tax initiatives to share the fruits of recent economic gains. These pressures were reflected in the political debate of the day where all political parties were eager to meet public expectations for more and better services. As well, the Irish economy was regarded by most as a model. The EU fiscal rules, the Stability and Growth Pact, were respected, debt fell and spending appeared to be well below EU levels. The underlying dangers were either missed or ignored.

Second, the Government’s Budget process was completely overwhelmed by two dominant processes - Programmes for Government and the Social Partnership process. We recommend major changes to the budgetary process that would enhance ministerial accountability to Parliament, expand the release of detailed departmental analysis for consultation well before Budget time and provide oversight by some form of Fiscal Council.

Third, the Department of Finance should have done more to avoid this outcome. It did provide warnings on pro-cyclical fiscal policy and expressed concern about the risks of an overheated construction sector. However, it should have adapted its advice in tone and urgency after a number of years of fiscal complacency. It should have been more sensitive to and provided specific advice on broader macroeconomic risks. And it should have shown more initiative in making these points and in its advice on the construction sector, and tax policy generally.

The Department:

  • does not have critical mass in areas where technical economic skills are required;

  • has too many generalists in positions requiring technical economic and other skills;

  • is more numbers driven, than strategic;

  • does not have sufficient engagement with the broader economic community in Ireland;

  • often operates in silos, with limited information sharing;

  • is poorly structured in a number of areas, including at the senior management level;


  • is poor on Human Resources Management.

The Public Service Management and Development Division should be managed as a separate entity, as either a separate Department, or reporting directly to the Minister of State for Public Service Modernisation. The Minister and the Department of Finance should retain authority over the overall wage bill, negotiating mandates for new collective bargaining processes and manage a single window with other Departments to control public spending.

This change should help focus effort on the extraordinary opportunity provided by the Croke Park Agreement to modernise the capacity of the Public Service. We recommend two other processes to help - - a fulltime Task Force from across Government to include individuals from the leading Departments and a Private Sector Advisory Board to help drive the process.

Related Articles
Related Articles

© Copyright 2011 by Finfacts.com

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
Ryanair revises up full-year profit guidance
AIB bank profitable in third quarter
Ryanair announces half-year profits up 32% to €795m
Ryanair benefits from improved customer service
Ryanair to buy 100 new Boeing 737 MAX 200
Finfacts server migration Thursday
State-owned Allied Irish Banks reports H1 2014 profit as bad loan charges plunge
Ryanair reports profit in its financial first quarter soared 152%
UK firm opens van dealership in Dublin
Ryanair reports 8% fall in full-year profit; US services to commence in 2019
Global Financial Centres Index: New York overtakes London; Dublin slips to 66 of 83 cities
Bank of Ireland reports “significant” improvement in 2013 results
Sale process of IBRC UK projects Rock and Salt completed
CRH says 2014 will be year of profit growth after reporting 2013 loss
Ryanair reports third-quarter loss
Irish Water says it saved €100m in setup costs
RSA Insurance fires two Irish executives for large loss/ accounting irregularities
Bank of Ireland will have to raise provisions by €1.4bn; AIB says it's "well capitalised"
CRH reports slightly improved third quarter
Central Bank says ownership of Newbridge Credit Union transferred to permanent tsb
Ryanair reports H1 profits rose by 1% to €602m
Dublin Web Summit: Irish Stock Exchange and NASDAQ OMX announce dual listing plan
Irish pension managed funds returned to growth during September
Dan O’Brien resigns as economics editor of The Irish Times
Central Bank says no action required on Anglo tapes revelations
Ryanair flew 9m passengers and Aer Lingus carried 1.1m in August
UK Competition Commission says Ryanair must cut Aer Lingus stake to 5%
CRH reports H1 2013 revenue dip and loss
Vodafone refunded UK after discovery of Irish tax haven deal
RBS reports half year profit; Ulster Bank posts reduced loss
Bank of Ireland cuts pretax losses in HI 2013 to €504m
Irish State-owned Allied Irish Banks reports losses of €758m in H1 2013
Service Announcement
Irish managed pension funds declined in June
VHI reports 2012 surplus of €54.3m; Health insurance made loss
Ex- Elan director says management / board "not competent to run a business"
Aer Lingus to put €140m in employees pensions fund; Ryanair apoplectic
Wednesday Newspaper Review - Irish Business News and International Stories - - May 22, 2013
Tuesday Newspaper Review - Irish Business News and International Stories - - May 21, 2013
Ryanair, Europe’s biggest low cost carrier, announced Monday record annual profits of €569m - - up 13%