| Click for the Finfacts Ireland Portal Homepage |

Finfacts Business News Centre

Home 
 
 News
 Irish
 Irish Economy
 EU Economy
 US Economy
 UK Economy
 Global Economy
 International
 Property
 Innovation
 
 Analysis/Comment
 
 Asia Economy

RSS FEED


How to use our RSS feed

Follow Finfacts on Twitter

 
Web Finfacts

See Search Box lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.

Welcome

Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and you are in its business news section.

Links

Finfacts Homepage

Irish Share Prices

Euribor Daily Rates

Irish Economy

Global Income Per Capita

Global Cost of Living

Irish Tax - Income/Corporate

Global News

Bloomberg News

CNN Money

Cnet Tech News

Newspapers

Irish Independent

Irish Times

Irish Examiner

New York Times

Financial Times

Technology News

 

Feedback

 

Content Management by interactivetools.com.

News : US Economy Last Updated: Feb 22, 2011 - 7:28 AM


US Inequality: Wage gap widened over past 30 years; Lowest 10% of earners got 5% inflation-adjusted rise in 1979-2009
By Michael Hennigan, Founder and Editor of Finfacts
Feb 21, 2011 - 1:48 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

US Inequality: The US wage gap has sharply widened over the past 30 years, according to an official study that was published last week. The inflation-adjusted pay rise in the period 1979-2009 for the lowest 10% paid of the working population, was 5%.

The research shows inequality increasing as hourly wages of employees in the 90th pay percentile - - those whose wage exceeded that of 90% of the working population - - stood at $38.50 in 2009, 364% more than the $8.30 an hour earned by those in the lowest 10th%ile. The Irish minimum hourly wage in 2009 was almost $12.

The study by the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) shows that in 1999, the difference was 332%, adjusted for inflation. The difference is more pronounced for men than women, at 383% versus 319%.

The wage rate (the wage per hour of work) received by workers in the middle of the wage distribution (the 50th%ile) increased by about 20% over the 1979–2009 period after adjusting for inflation, reaching about $17 per hour in 2009. The dispersion of wages - - the gap between wages at the top and bottom of the distribution - - also increased over that period, but the pattern of changes at the top and bottom differed.

For men and women alike, the gap between the wage rates received by high-wage (90th percentile) and middle-wage workers expanded throughout the 30-year period; the wage rates of high-wage women grew especially rapidly. In contrast, the gap between the wage rates received by low-wage (10th percentile) and middle-wage workers widened for both men and women early in the 1980s but has remained stable for the past 20 years.

Between 1979 and 2009, the median (the mid-point with 50% above and 50% below) wage rate of men increased by about 8% after adjusting for inflation. The 90th percentile wage rate increased much faster, by 40%, whereas the 10th percentile wage rate increased slightly more slowly, by 5%.

The CBO says given the complex pattern of changes in the wage distribution during the past 30 years, it is not surprising that no single explanation can account for the entire pattern.

It says in the category of market forces, innovations in information and computing technology in the 1990s and 2000s generated growing demand for skilled labour, particularly for highly educated workers, that outpaced growth in the supply of highly skilled, highly educated workers; that differential probably played a large role in the observed changes in the wage distribution.

Shifts in international trade might also have contributed to increasing relative demand for skilled labour, as imports from low-wage countries substituted for some domestic production and employment; however, the CBO says research on the significance of that effect is inconclusive. In addition, a rising number of foreign-born people in the workforce affected the relative supply of workers with different amounts of education, but that shift appears to have had only a modest effect on the distribution of wages.

An important factor as well have been cozy cartel-style arrangements at the top and simply a system where there were few restrictions on senior executives grabbing what they could get away with, from crony boards and hired remuneration consultants who were always able to find a convenient benchmark. 

The Washington DC-based Economic Policy Institute think-tank said in 2008 that US CEOs in major companies earned 24 times more than a typical worker; this ratio grew to 35 in 1978 and to 71 in 1989. The ratio surged in the 1990s and hit 298 at the end of the recovery in 2000. The fall in the stock market reduced CEO stock-related pay (e.g., options), causing CEO pay to tumble to 143 times that of the average worker in 2002. Since then, however, CEO pay has recovered and by 2007 was 275 times that of the typical worker. In other words, in 2007 a CEO earned more in one workday (there are 260 in a year) than the typical worker earned all year.

Finfacts articles:

America: A country you cannot tell a lie about

US economist says rising executive pay gap has spawned expenditure cascades throughout the economy

Related Articles
Related Articles


© Copyright 2011 by Finfacts.com

Top of Page

US Economy
Latest Headlines
US jobs rose by 215,000 in July; Unemployment rate stable at 5.3%
US economy grew at weak pace in Q2 2015 - Worst expansion since 1945
Decoupling of per capita GDP, productivity, private employment, and median family income in America
US economy stumbles again in 2015
Income gap highest in 30 years; No inequality rise in best-paying US firms
Fed minutes raise doubts about fragility of US recovery
Senate Democrats block trade deal authority for Obama
Five firms held 25% of top US non-financial companies cash pile in 2014
US added 223,000 jobs in April; Broad jobless rate at 10.8%
Investment struggles as dividends/ share buybacks at top US firms to exceed $1tn in 2015
US economic growth plunged in Q1 2015
Why the Fed may (almost) never raise interest rates
US jobless rate falls to 5.5%; Broad rate at 11%; Participation rate at 1978 level
US added 257,000 jobs in January; Broad jobless rate at 11.3%
US economy will soon see best years in a decade
US annualised GDP slowed sharply in final quarter 2014
US budget deficit to fall to 2.6% of GDP in 2015
US added 252,000 jobs in December; Jobless rate falls to 5.6%
US adds 321,000 jobs in November; Private sector adds 10.9m jobs in 57 months of growth
US manufacturing slowed in November
US retail spending over Thanksgiving weekend fell 11%
US consumer spending weak in October; Business investment fell again
US third-quarter GDP revised up to 3.9% annualised rate
After destroying banking secrecy US helps Swiss exporters
US oil imports from OPEC cartel at 30-year low
Tax-inverted "Irish" firm Actavis agrees to buy US Botox maker Allergan
US nonfarm payroll employment rose 214,000 in October' Jobless @ 6-year low
Swiss bankers await fallout of US tax evasion acquittal
Two PMI reports give contrasting trends on US manufacturing
US GDP increased at annualised 3.5% in third quarter of 2014
US city home price growth slowed again in August; Consumer confidence rebounded in September
US new orders for manufactured durable goods fell again in September
Loans to buy US shares at record highs
Global markets slide; US industrial production best in 3 years & jobless claims in 14-year low
US federal budget deficit dips to 2.9% of GDP in fiscal year 2014
US added 248,000 jobs in September; Jobless rate falls to 5.9%
US set to become world’s leading liquid petroleum producer again
Obama issues new rules to combat tax inversions
US Securities and Exchange Commission to pay $30m award to foreign whistleblower
Typical American household income in 2013 was below the 1989 level