| Click for the Finfacts Ireland Portal Homepage |

Finfacts Business News Centre

Home 
 
 News
 Irish
 Irish Economy
 EU Economy
 US Economy
 UK Economy
 Global Economy
 International
 Property
 Innovation
 
 Analysis/Comment
 
 Asia Economy

RSS FEED


How to use our RSS feed

Follow Finfacts on Twitter

 
Web Finfacts

See Search Box lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.

Welcome

Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and you are in its business news section.

Links

Finfacts Homepage

Irish Share Prices

Euribor Daily Rates

Irish Economy

Global Income Per Capita

Global Cost of Living

Irish Tax - Income/Corporate

Global News

Bloomberg News

CNN Money

Cnet Tech News

Newspapers

Irish Independent

Irish Times

Irish Examiner

New York Times

Financial Times

Technology News

 

Feedback

 

Content Management by interactivetools.com.

News : Innovation Last Updated: May 17, 2011 - 11:30 AM


Global Innovation 2010: Research spending by top 1,000 companies fell in 2009; Apple gets bigger bang for buck
By Finfacts Team
Nov 17, 2010 - 2:02 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Global Innovation 2010: Total R&D spending among the world’s top spenders on innovation fell in 2009 for the first time in the 13 years studied, according to the 2010 Global Innovation 1000, the sixth annual study of corporate innovation spending, released this month by global management consulting firm Booz & Company. The study revealed that the 1,000 companies that spent the most on research and development decreased their total R&D spending by 3.5% to $503bn in 2009. This followed a relatively strong 2008 during which R&D spending continued to grow despite the recession. Apple showed again that it gets a bigger bang for its spending on research, which is far outpaced by Microsoft and Nokia.

In 2009, revenues for the Innovation 1000 plunged 11% from $15.1trn in 2008 to $13.4trn - -  nearly three times the rate of decline in R&D spending. As a result, R&D intensity, or R&D spending as a percentage of revenue, actually increased  -- from 3.46% in 2008 to 3.75% in 2009. Compared to the 3.5% reduction in R&D spending, the 1,000 top R&D spenders cut much more deeply into both sales, general and administrative expenses (a 5.4% reduction), and capital expenditures (a 17.5% drop).

“It’s no surprise that the worldwide recession finally caught up with the world’s top innovation spenders in 2009, causing them to trim their innovation budgets. However, the relatively modest cuts in R&D spending compared to much larger declines in revenues demonstrates the continued importance of innovation as a critical component of corporate strategy to companies in every industry,” said Barry Jaruzelski, partner at Booz & Company. “As the recession draws to a close and corporate earnings rebound, 2010 will be an important test of their commitment to innovation. Indeed, the most forward looking companies will likely move quickly to restore the R&D cuts they made in 2009.”

Booz & Company analysed the world’s top 1,000 public corporations’ research and development spending for 2009 in what it claims to be the most comprehensive effort to assess the link between innovation and corporate performance. The study uncovers insights into how organizations can get the best return on their innovation investment. This year’s study also examined the capabilities needed to maximize the impact of a company’s innovation efforts, in good times and bad, and highlighted the benefits of focusing on the short list of capabilities that generate differential advantage.

Download the Booz Company 2010 report: How Top Innovators Keep Winning (pdf)

Among the 2010 Global Innovation 1000 study’s key findings:

More than half of all companies Booz & Company tracked cut their R&D spending in 2009 and nearly all the cuts came in just three industries: Auto, computing and electronics, and industrials. The other seven industries examined – health, software and Internet, telecom, chemicals and energy, aerospace and defense, consumer, and industrials – all increased spending to some degree.

  • The car industry alone accounted for fully two-thirds of the $18bn contraction in R&D spending:The industry’s 14.3% decrease in R&D spend slightly outpaced its 12.7% decrease in revenue.
  • The computing and electronics industry reported similar, but less drastic, R&D spending reductions with no change in the industry’s R&D intensity:Industry revenues were down by 6.7% from 2008 to 2009 as a result of the recession and accompanying drop in sales. The 6.7% decline in R&D for computers and electronics tracked the decline in revenue.
Despite a decline in R&D spending, computing and electronics retained its top spot as the industry that spent the most on innovation, while auto remained at number three. Healthcare took the number two spot, increasing R&D by 1.5%, much slower than the industry’s revenue growth rate of 6.0%.

Japan saw the largest percentage drop in spending by region in which a company was headquartered. Given the recession’s overall effect on innovation spending, companies headquartered in regions hit hardest cut R&D spending the most, on average.
  • R&D spending by companies headquartered in Japan dropped by 10.8%, North American spending declined by 2.8%, while Europe’s declined by just 0.2%.
  • In contrast, companies headquartered in China and India boosted R&D spending by 41.8%, although from a small base, as they account for only 1% of total Global Innovation 1000 corporate R&D spending.
Changes in the world’s top 20 spenders on innovation mark further signs of the times:
  • Pharmaceutical giant Roche Holding took the top position for innovation spending, having boosted its R&D spend 11.6% to $9.1bn, replacing Toyota Motor, which cut spending nearly 20% and fell to fourth place
  • In fact, healthcare companies took 5 of the top 10 spots on the list and 7 of the top 20.
  • Microsoft (No.2), Nokia (3) and Pfizer (5) rounded out the top five.
Study looks at capabilities needed to successfully Innovate; Spending doesn’t correlate with success

For the first time, this year’s Global Innovation 1000 provided a deeper look at the capabilities required for companies to innovate successfully. To do so, Booz & Company conducted a Web-based survey of more than 450 innovation executives from 400 leading companies representing more than $150bn in annual R&D spending  - - 40% of total Innovation 1000 company R&D spend for 2009. Respondents represented all nine industry sectors, and were asked to evaluate the innovation capabilities they believed were the most important in the value chain as well as their performance in each of these capabilities.

In 2007, the Global Innovation 1000 study identified three distinct innovation strategies that companies deploy to create and take products to market - - Need Seekers, Market Readers, and Tech Drivers. This year’s survey and corresponding analysis outlined a set of distinct innovation capabilities that are essential for success in each of the three strategies.

The survey found that companies that focus on a set of innovation capabilities most consistent with their innovation strategy and tightly aligned with their overall corporate strategy outperform their rivals. Companies in the Global Innovation 1000 that take such a coherent approach to capabilities reported higher profit margins than their competitors, by up to 22%.

“There is no statistically significant relationship between financial performance and the amount spent on innovation. What really matters are the particular combinations of talent, knowledge, team structures, tools and processes that successful companies put together to enable their innovation efforts,” said Kevin Dehoff, Booz & Company partner. “Our study found that innovators who achieve this state of ‘corporate coherence’ consistently outperform their rivals on several financial measures.”

The survey further asked innovation leaders to name three companies they consider to be most innovative in the world. Apple far and away led the Top 10, named by 79 percent of those surveyed, followed by Google with 49 percent. 3M followed next with 20 percent. Only three of the companies on the “ten most innovative” list also appear on this year’s top spenders list: Toyota, Microsoft and Samsung, reiterating the lack of correlation between the magnitude of R&D spending an innovation results.

In 2009, Microsoft spent 15.4% of sales on research; Nokia spent 14.4% and Apple spent 3.1%.

This year, Nokia fired its CEO as the company struggled to compete with Apple's iPhone.

Finfacts article, May 2010: Apple overtakes Microsoft as the world's most valuable technology company

Finfacts reported last June that the pharmaceutical industry continues to rely heavily on sales from an ageing portfolio of drugs, whilst the proportion of total sales from newer drugs has dropped, despite spending as much as $65bn on R&D in the US in 2009.

Finfacts article, June 2010: Pharmaceutical Industry: Proportion of sales from newer drugs drops; $65bn spent in US on R&D in 2009; 200,000 jobs to go in 2009-2015

Booz & Company 2010 Global Innovation 1000: Methodology

Booz & Company identified the 1,000 public companies around the world that spent the most on research and development in 2009 (companies for which public data on R&D spending was available). This is the same approached used in the previous five years of the study.

Booz & Company analysed key financial metrics for each of the top 1,000 companies from 2002 through 2009 - -  including sales, gross profit, operating profit, net profit, R&D expenditure, and market capitalization. All foreign currency sales and R&D expenditure figures through 2009 were translated into US dollars at 2009 daily average exchange rates. In addition, total shareholder return was gathered and adjusted for each company’s corresponding local market.

Each company was coded into one of nine (9) industry sectors (or “other”) and into one of five regional designations as determined by each company’s reported headquarters location. To enable meaningful comparisons across industries, Booz & Company indexed the R&D spending levels and financial performance metrics for each company against the industry group’s median values.

Related Articles
Related Articles


© Copyright 2011 by Finfacts.com

Top of Page

Innovation
Latest Headlines
Digital Taylorism: Amazon's chief rejects depiction of "soulless, dystopian workplace"
Most surviving startups do not grow; Tiny number powers jobs engine
Despite euro dip China & US remain most competitive manufacturing nations
Business startup rates up in most OECD countries led by Australia and UK
NASA's Kepler mission has confirmed the first near-Earth-size planet
Energy subsidies at 6.5% of global GDP; Commodity prices to remain weak
US startups rely on personal savings, debt; Venture capital funds less than 1%
Europe produces 13 $1bn+ "unicorn" startups in one year; London is Europe's digital capital
Irish-based firms raised €120m in VC funding in Q1 2015; Some top recipients Irish for tax purposes
Ireland: Fourth highest 25-34 year old ratio of third-level graduates in developed world: So what?
Business dynamism/ employer firm startups in US secular decline
Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015: Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Germany are on top
Education systems failing to provide students with skills for success in 21st century
US, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland have best higher education systems
Handbook of Service Innovation: Ireland moving up the value chain?
Switzerland revives silk industry that thrived for two centuries
Sales of Irish tech firms create 300 millionaires in 15 years and no scaleups
Apple warns of 'material' tax payments from EU's Irish tax investigation
Apple earnings surge 33% on higher price and iPhone sales jump in China
Big Pharma's internationalisation of R&D to China
The dangers of romanticising entrepreneurs despite key role
UK and Irish business R&D heavily reliant on foreign-owned firms
Silicon Valley and the development of the silicon microchip - Part 2
Ireland: Innovation with or without R&D/ scientific breakthroughs
UK government most open/ transparent in world; Ireland & Greece lowest ranking in Europe
10 questions about Switzerland's Solar Impulse aircraft – answered
Silicon Valley loses its silicon; Typical household income stagnates - Part 1
21st century skills are 18 century skills + a computer
Growing ICT sector in Europe accounts for 5% of employment
Should Ireland copy Singapore's scientific research investment plan?
Startups vs Scaleups: 4% of UK startups have 10+ employees 10 years later
Irish patent filings at European Patent Office fell in 2014
Facebook's maze of privacy settings maybe in breach of European law
Apple to invest €1.7bn in Irish and Danish data centres
Silicon Valley insider warns of dodgy $1bn valuations of private companies
Israel's Startup Nation not a jobs engine; Nor is Irish high tech
Established industries often beat new technology investment returns
Ireland: Noonan said EU to drop Apple tax case; Now expects court case
Irish R&D Tax Credit: No evidence of rising business innovation; Facts don't matter
Apple reports biggest profit of a public company in history