See Search Box
lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be
the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that
developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.
Welcome
Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and
you are in its business news section.
Dr. Peter Morici: US Economy; More infrastructure, payroll tax holidays and mortgage aid won’t end jobs drought
By Professor Peter Morici
Sep 8, 2010 - 3:11:12 AM
President Barack Obama, with Secretary of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and George Mitchell, Special Envoy for Middle East Peace, leaves the Oval Office, Sept. 1, 2010, to make a statement to the press in the Rose Garden of the White House.
Dr. Peter Morici: US Economy; With Congressional
Democrats facing a November shellacking, President Obama is floating new
programs - - more infrastructure spending, payroll tax holidays and mortgage aid
- - to aid troubled homeowners and create jobs that will prove costly and
ineffective.
Despite rock bottom interest rates, residential sales are at historic lows and
two million families face foreclosure this year, because Americans need decent
jobs to buy homes and pay mortgages.
With President Obama’s $787bn stimulus package at maximum force, his health care
reforms inexorably socializing 19% of the U.S. economy, and Wall Street
revamping to met new financial regulations, the economy lost 54,000 jobs in
August, the private sector added a mere 67,000 jobs, and unemployment rose to
9.6%.
Of new private sector jobs, 40,000 were in health care and social
assistance—largely financed by government largess and federal mandates—while
temporary services accounted for another 17,000.
Morici’s index of core private sector employment—private sector jobs less health
care, social assistance and temp services—was up a paltry 10,000. On an annual
basis, that would be less than five% of new high school and college graduates.
Now, the President wants another $50bn in infrastructure spending, stretched
over six years and funded by cuts elsewhere. Though adding to construction and
supply industry employment, cutting other spending would subtract jobs
elsewhere.
Also, the President proposes repealing the Bush tax cuts for families earning
more than $250,000 and using the money to forgive some payroll taxes for new
hires by small businesses.
What the President does not reveal is his policy would hike to 50% the marginal
tax rates on enterprises that account for more than half all small business
profits—the very mom and pop enterprises he wants to hire the unemployed.
Restaurants and machine shops are not hiring, because they don’t have enough
diners and factory orders. A modest hiring subsidy won’t solve that problem, but
new taxes and health care mandates could persuade small businesses to close shop
altogether.
The history of investment and employment tax credits is those only have modest
immediate effects; then several months later, enterprises spend less—much like
recent experience with cash for clunkers and auto sales, and tax credits for
first time homebuyers.
Discussing President
Obama's latest stimulus measures, with Steven Ricchiuto, Mizuho Securities, and
Joseph LaVorgna, Deutsche Bank:
In the end, businesses build and staff with workers only as much capacity as the
demand for what they sell will justify.
Demand for what Americans make is tanking thanks to a growing trade deficit with
China instigated by trade agreements negotiated by President Clinton, and fear
instilled by the Pelosi-era Democratic Party’s obsession with taxes and
regulations for businesses and personal behavior.
The President already has in place programs to help distressed homeowners behind
on mortgages. Those aid too few families, because banks can’t rework mortgages
for underemployed workers with low incomes and the federal bureaucracy is so
ineffective at implementing presidential policy.
Now, the White House proposes that for homeowners, up-to-date on payments but
whose mortgages exceed value of their homes, banks and investors forgive the
equity gap and the Federal Housing Administration back up new mortgages on the
market values of those homes.
Wisely, banks and investors are reluctant to write-off debt on performing
loans—they may actually get out what they are owed in the long run. Banks are
likely to hoist on to the FHA—and the taxpayer—homeowners they believe are
likely to fall behind on payments soon.
It’s another election year ploy that will blow up later, because those new loans
will fail and require much higher fees for honest FHA (Federal Housing Agency)
mortgages.
When Republicans point out the shortcomings of those proposed jobs and mortgage
initiatives, President Obama will cast them as cynical defenders of the rich.
President Obama likes to claim conditions are better now than when he took over
from President Bush but things are getting worse, and this November voters elect
a Congress and Speaker not a President.
When Nancy Pelosi and Democrats took control in January 2007, the federal
deficit was $161bn and unemployment was 4.6%. Subsequently, Wall Street, with
help from President Clinton’s repeal of Glass Steagall, threw the economy into
the Great Recession, and Speaker Pelosi and President Obama have since spent and
regulated recklessly with few positive results.
If President Obama insists on teaching Americans economic history, his syllabus
should give adequate attention to all the contributors to the catastrophe we now
endure.
”The stimulus package just
hasn’t delivered” Peter Morici from the University of Maryland told CNBC
Friday, Sept 3rd, adding he is not impressed by President Obama’s economic
policies:
Peter Morici,
Professor, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland,