See Search Box
lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be
the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that
developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.
Welcome
Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and
you are in its business news section.
Bank for International Settlements study says pre-financial crisis debt will continue to fall; May not seriously impact growth
By Finfacts Team
Sep 6, 2010 - 4:01:48 AM
A study published by the Bank
for International Settlements on Sunday says households and
companies will continue to cut debt built up before the
financial crisis. However, it does not necessarily follow
that economic growth prospects will be seriously impacted.
Economists Garry Tang and
Christian Upper at the Basel, Switzerland-based bank, known
as the central bank for central banks, say that financial
crises tend to be followed by a protracted period of debt
reduction in the nonfinancial private sector. They report
that a period of debt reduction followed 17 out of 20
systemic banking crises that were preceded by surges in
credit. Debt/GDP ratios fell by an average of 38 percentage
points, returning to approximately the levels seen before
the increase. They say if history is any guide, we should
expect to see a much more significant reduction in private
sector debt, particularly of households, than has so far
taken place after the recent crisis. The costs of this
process in forgone output are difficult to pin down, but
there are reasons to believe that they need not be high
provided that the banking sector problems that led to the
crisis are fixed.
The
study says US households increased their
indebtedness from close to 100% of disposable income in 2000
to more than 130% in 2007. Similarly, over the same period,
British and Spanish households raised their debt by
approximately 60 percentage points to more than 160% and
almost 130%, respectively, of disposable income. Ireland's
ratio rose to about 190%. The expansion in debt was not
confined to households. Non-financial corporations in
several, but not all, of these countries also increased
their debt substantially, mainly to finance real estate, and
subsequently experienced servicing problems.
The economists say mounting loan
delinquencies are a clear indication that this rise in
indebtedness was not sustainable. Some of the debt will not
be repaid and will have to be written off, if it has not
already been. But debt reduction may not stop there. Lower
house prices may induce households to reduce their desired
levels of debt. Similarly, a lower level of output and
tighter financial conditions could put firms under pressure
to reduce their leverage.
The smallest amount of debt reduction by
private, non- financial borrowers in the study was in Chile,
where the ratio of debt to GDP fell by 10 percentage points
from 1982-1983. That’s still more than what borrowers have
achieved so far after the most recent crisis.
The economists say there are reasons to
believe that slides in economic output are not the
consequence of the debt reduction process but would have
occurred anyway. The first reason to suspect that debt
reduction need not be costly is based on the dynamics of
output and credit ratios after the crisis. Output often
starts to contract before real credit, reaches a trough more
quickly, and then at a rapid pace even though debt ratios
are still falling.
A second reason for doubting that the
reduction in debt ratios is the main cause of output losses
after crises is the experience of crises preceded by a
credit boom but not followed by a debt reduction. There were
three such crises in the sample, of which two were followed
by drops in output of a magnitude similar to those
associated with the crises followed by debt reduction,
although the third one was not
The economists say changes in
the flow of credit rather than the stock of credit are the
key factor.
They says policymakers have first to fix the
problems in the banking system that led to the financial
crisis. The experience of Japan, but also that of other
crises, indicates that this requires essentially two things:
to (i) recognise losses, and (ii) rebuild bank capital.
Recovery following an individual
crisis case has often happened in recent decades against a positive
international backdrop.
The current crisis has severely hit
several advanced countries and has been the severest peacetime contraction since
the Great Depression. So the past pattern may not be exactly replicated.