See Search Box
lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be
the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that
developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.
Welcome
Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and
you are in its business news section.
SEPA, the Single Euro Payments Area, may
become operational in 2012 and will enable customers to
make cashless euro payments to anyone located anywhere in
Europe, using a single payment account and a single set of
payment instruments.
The European Central
Bank
says if you travel from one Eurozone country to another,
you can easily buy something with euro in cash. But making
cashless payments outside your home country, for example with a
debit card, is more difficult. This is due to technical, legal
and market barriers stemming from the period prior to the
introduction of the single currency. SEPA aims to overcome these
barriers. The result will be a single market for retail payments
in euro.
In a commentary, Deutsche Bank
Research says SEPA aims to realise a Europe-wide single
market in non-cash bulk payment transactions. Cross-border credit transfers,
direct debits and card payments are to become just as efficient, inexpensive and
secure as national payments. It has been possible to make SEPA credit transfers
since January 2008 and SEPA direct debits since November 2009. Currently
however, the SEPA format is only being used for one in thirteen credit
transfers. The European Commission has decided to intervene by means of a
regulation that sets an end-date for the parallel operation of national systems
and the new SEPA system. Both the German government and the Federation of German
Consumer Organisations (vzbz) consider the final migration of national account
numbers and sort codes to IBAN and BIC to be asking too much of consumers. But
DBR says what is truly unbearable is that a speedy changeover is being prevented by the
protracted process.
The advantages of a Single €uro Payments Area (SEPA)
Economists Meta Zähres and Sophie Ahlswede
say the advantages of the changeover are manifold, and will benefit everybody
involved: there is cost-cutting potential mainly for companies operating
throughout Europe as well as authorities; there will be a wider choice of
payment services providers, faster and more efficient processes as well as
greater transparency for consumers. Over the medium term, lower fees can also be
expected in high-price markets. According to Capgemini calculations dating from
2008, a speedy changeover to SEPA could create added value for the economies of
Europe to the tune of between €123bn and €362bn over a period of six
years.
Efficiency gains for the overall economy require joint action
Efficiency gains for the economy as a whole, however, can only be achieved if
SEPA and the Payment Services Directive (PSD) are fully implemented across the
entire SEPA territory. Only under identical EU-wide competition
conditions can payment providers throughout the single market compete for
customers with their respective price/performance offers. Moreover, protracted
parallel operations of SEPA and the national systems will saddle users and
suppliers with unnecessary costs. The changeover should therefore
take place within the next two to three years, at the latest. Reasonable
transition periods should be applied to allow customers and banks to get used to
the adjustments in domestic payment transactions.
Most non-cash payments are automated
The economists say besides the many benefits related to the changeover to an EU-wide SEPA
system, it should be kept in mind - - when faced with criticism of the “excessively
long new account numbers” - - that in 2009 most non-cash transactions were made by
means of direct debit (50%) which does not require input of the relevant account
number for each transaction. The situation is similar for the 35% of total
payments that are made by credit transfer in the form of standing orders or at
the ATM (automated teller machine) where the customer’s own account number is
inserted automatically. Hence, consumers will not notice the changes directly in
the lion’s share of non-cash payments.
The logic behind IBAN and BIC - not so difficult after all
Furthermore, the logic behind the IBAN (International Bank Account
Number) is actually very straightforward. In Germany it is comprised of
22 characters, starting with the country code (DE). This is followed by a
two-number check digit, which validates the account number and sort code before
the payment is carried out. The check digit is generated only once for each
account number. It is followed by the (existing) eight-digit German sort code as
well as the up to ten-digit (existing) account number. This means that only the
country code and - - for security reasons - - the two-number check digit are
actually new.
For cross-border payments, IBAN has long been a mandatory component. In some
countries, such as Luxembourg, Italy and Belgium, it is already being used as
the sole identification number in domestic payment transactions.
Use of the BIC (Bank Identifier Code), by contrast, could be
optional, as is the case already in Italy, for instance. For private customers,
the BIC could be automatically identified at the ATM and in online banking (as
is the case at present with sort codes) or the bank could add it during
settlement.
Zähres and Ahlswede say that comprehensive transitions from existing to new systems will always face a
certain amount of resistance. A case in point is the changeover from four- to
five-digit postcodes in Germany in 1993. In hindsight, the new postcodes became
swiftly established and people quickly forgot the old four-digit codes. In a
transition process like this, which affects practically all citizens, the state
plays an important role: it can smooth the changeover via a diverse range of
measures (providing information, setting an example, creating incentives for
first users). First and foremost, though, the state must show that it is fully
committed to the changeover rather than undermining it. To date, the German
government has promoted the SEPA concept: an EU-wide and uniform introduction of
the rules has always been its declared objective. The recent partial retreat
from this position will have only two consequences: unsettled consumers and
higher costs for everybody the longer that the full changeover is postponed.