See Search Box
lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be
the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that
developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.
Welcome
Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and
you are in its business news section.
The Irish Independent reports that NAMA will only recover €16bn for the taxpayer on the €40bn
it intends to spend on risky property loans from the banks,
Standard & Poor's (S&P) has estimated.
The agency, which downgraded Ireland's credit rating on
Tuesday, said that only €16bn (equal to 10pc of GDP) would
be recovered based on information it had seen. It didn't
elaborate any further. The Government, on the other hand, hopes to make a full
recovery of the entire amount. S&P, which competes with agencies Fitch and Moody's, said
the €16bn would be recovered "over the timeframe that our
ratings address". The Irish Independent established
yesterday that this was a reference to a five-year period.
The National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) strongly
disputed the S&P claims yesterday, saying the agency was
effectively declaring NAMA assets to be worthless.
But the agency makes it clear this is not the case.
Instead it is worried about the ability of NAMA to turn its
assets into hard cash in a short space of time.
"In our view, the loans that NAMA is acquiring have
limited liquidity and cannot readily be sold in the near
term,'' S&P said.
Liability
Referring to the first batch of loans NAMA has taken
over, S&P added: "We view these loans as having value, and
as recoveries occur in the medium term we expect them to be
available to pay down general government debt."
The NTMA and the agency seem to differ over when Ireland
should be given credit for taking over the assets. S&P said
that when sales actually take place "we may revise our ...
estimates of Ireland's gross and net general government
debt".
But the Government, the EU and the statistics agency,
Eurostat, take a different view, allowing the Government to
move NAMA and associated debt completely off the balance
sheet. Instead of becoming a direct liability, it becomes a
contingent liability, making the net debt figures for the
country look better.
But S&P has a different approach and made it clear
yesterday this method was also being applied to other
countries, like Spain and Cyprus. "We deduct only those
assets which we believe to be equivalent to cash," said the
agency.
This emphasis on liquid assets, as opposed to
harder-to-value property assets, was the main cause of
disagreement between the NTMA and the agency yesterday.
S&P believes the ultimate haircut on NAMA assets will be
46pc, as opposed to its previous estimate of 45pc. It also
thinks Ireland will have to borrow about €40bn to buy NAMA
assets, as opposed to €43bn.
"We have adjusted this amount to take account of the fact
that 5pc of NAMA's payment to the banks is intended to be in
subordinated debt that has no recourse to the Government,''
it adds.
"NAMA's own business plan applies a discount of 50pc on
the nominal amount of loans it expects to be transferred
from the bank,'' S&P pointed out.
NAMA is currently working on moving its third tranche of
loans out of the banks. The deadline is next February, when
the EU has demanded that the process be completed.
The Irish Independent also reports that an error by Anglo Irish Bank has led to the bank failing to register a
claim for €15m against the failed Icelandic bank Kaupthing, the Irish
Independent has learned.
Anglo, nationalised in January 2009, was a
senior bondholder with Kaupthing and is among thousands of creditors
looking to recover some value from its investment in the bank.
It is understood that a "process error"
meant the bank did not make a
final deadline for staking a claim and chief executive Mike Aynsley is
believed to be angry about the situation.
Anglo is nominally owed €15m by the Icelandic bank, although there
was no certainty it would have recovered the full amount. But the bank
was unsuccessful in registering its claim due to an error and is now
appealing, claiming the rules for submitting claims were unclear.
It is understood Anglo had originally made a claim but was required
to resubmit this claim and failed to do so.
If the appeal is successful, the bank will be able to claim a
percentage of the original amount. Anglo has written down the value of
the bonds in its books to about €600,000.
Crisis
Kaupthing, based in Reykjavik, was a victim of the Iceland banking
crisis of 2008 and ended up being declared bankrupt, causing huge losses
for those holding securities in the bank.
It was at its peak the largest bank in Iceland and was the
seventh-largest Nordic bank.
Anglo itself is presenting its half-year results next week and is
expected to unveil further large losses, although not on the scale of
its last financial results.
The movement of its loans to NAMA will be the chief factor in the
results, to be unveiled by Mr Aynsley and other senior directors.
Kaupthing is currently run by a resolution committee. The role of the
committee is to safeguard the value of the bank's assets and to maximise
the recovery of claims on behalf of creditors. The resolution committee
holds the powers of the board of directors.
The Irish Times reports that the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) yesterday took
the unusual step of trying to dampen concerns over the
Republic’s fiscal stability by publicly criticising rating
agency Standard Poor’s (S&P) one-notch downgrade of Ireland.
Describing the methodology behind the downgrade as “flawed”,
NTMA chief executive John Corrigan said the rating agency’s
decision not to attribute any value to National Asset Management
Agency (Nama) loans was “not a realistic approach in our view”.
“Exceptionally, we’ve taken issue to the rating agency. There
comes a point when the analysis is not robust," Mr Corrigan said
in an interview with RTÉ.
The S&P downgrade came on the back of the projected cost in
bailing out the Irish banking sector, with the rating agency
revising upwards its estimated cost of recapitalisations to the
Irish Government to € 45-€ 50 billion. Of this, up to € 35
billion could be spent bailing out Anglo Irish Bank “over time”,
due to asset deterioration, while SP also said that “similar
developments could take place at some other Irish banks”.
However, Mr Corrigan responded by saying S&P’s estimate of
the cost of repairing the banking system was “at the extreme end
of any analyst’s comment”.
While it wasn’t apparent yesterday that the markets had
responded favourably to Mr Corrigan’s assertions – the spread on
the yield of Irish bonds compared to German bonds reached a new
high of 344 basis points – market analysts nonetheless came out
in favour of the highly respected debt management agency’s
stance.
David Schnautz, an interest-rate strategist at Commerzbank in
London, said he felt “more in the camp of the NTMA”, and that he
sympathised to some extent with the NTMA.
While he acknowledged the need to reassess the Government’s
credit risk, he described S&P’s decision to treat Nama loans
wholly as debt as a view he didn’t share. “Hopefully it will get
something back,” he said.
Oliver Mangan, chief bond economist with AIB Global Treasury,
also argued Nama loans were “worth something, not worth nothing”
and that there was no harm in the NTMA making its displeasure
known.
Investors across Europe were also positive on the outlook for
Irish bonds. Lothar Mentel, chief investment officer at Octopus
Investments, told Bloomberg News he was more a “buyer than a
seller” of Irish bonds, and he criticised the rating agencies
for being “overly cautious” following their poor track record in
rating securities leading up to the credit crunch.
Fine Gael finance spokesman Michael Noonan described the
downgrade as a “hammer blow to the economy”, and blamed it on
the Government’s “failed banking policy”.
“In particular, confidence is being undermined due to
uncertainty over the final cost of the bank rescue.” He called
on Minister for Finance Brian Lenihan to “give certainty to the
markets” by putting a final figure on the cost of the bank
rescue.
S&P has the most aggressive stance on Ireland, reflecting its
concerns of the cost of supporting the banking sector, but its
view is at odds with that of its counterpart Moody’s, which on
Monday published a report reiterating its “stable” outlook for
Ireland.
The Irish Times' Simon Carswell says it was not the smartest response by the Government’s debt
management agency, the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA),
to a further cut in Ireland’s credit rating by international
appraisers.
Publicly challenging not only the views of a
credit rating agency but its methodology is rare, if not unheard
of, in financial markets.
“It is very difficult and probably unwise to fight the
market,” said one economic commentator who added that it also
brought the issue further into the spotlight.
The reasons for Standard & Poor’s (S&P) downgrade – rather
than the downgrade itself – and putting Ireland on negative
watch (meaning a further ratings cut is likely) is what has
brought the agency out fighting.
S&P blamed substantially higher costs to support our
struggling financial institutions, namely Anglo Irish Bank, and
the cost of buying impaired loans through Nama for the
downgrade.
The agency said S&P’s analysis was flawed – it had failed to
assign any value to assets, such as loans backing valuable
properties in London, purchased by Nama as well as the
Government’s investments in AIB and Bank of Ireland.
Chief executive of the NTMA John Corrigan said that S&P’s way
of calculating government debt did not match the approach of the
International Monetary Fund or the European Union’s statistics
agency. In SP’s defence, it is consistent – its analysts have
used the same method to determine the debt and ratings of Spain
and Cyprus. “If you are in Germany, who are you going to
believe?” asked one banker rhetorically, pointing to the
futility of the NTMA’s defence.
The rate investors demand to hold Irish 10-year bonds over
the equivalent German bond rose to a record level before falling
slightly.
The trouble is not with S&P but in the uncertainty about the
final cost of Anglo, what the Government plans to do with the
bank, how big a stake the Government will have to take in AIB
and whether the banks can stand alone without the guarantee.
The Government’s problem is that it is relying on the
European Commission, Nama and the markets for resolution of
these issues.
Meanwhile, the capital bill at Anglo is heading towards €25
billion with no certainty it won’t rise further once Nama
assesses the quality of the remaining €20 billion in loans it
will purchase from the bank.
All this comes at a difficult time for the banks as they seek
to refinance more than €20 billion in debt before the end of the
blanket two-year guarantee next month.
The Irish Examiner reports that Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has said
that Government cutbacks are hindering Irish and European recovery and
could lead to "a longer- term Japanese-style malaise of weak growth".
The author of Freefall said Europe’s cutback culture could push it back
into recession. He specifically criticised the Irish goal of returning
to a deficit of 3% of GDP by 2014.
"I think that is a kind of short-sighted behaviour that makes no
economic sense," Joseph Stiglitz told listeners to Morning Ireland on
RTÉ Radio 1 yesterday.
No business ever expresses its targets in terms of how much debt it has,
or in terms of how much deficit it has. It looks at its balance sheet,
its liabilities and its assets.
"In the US, had we just spent a little bit of money building those
levees in New Orleans, we would have saved a couple of a hundred billion
dollars. The internet was financed by the US government, the most
important innovation in the latter part of the 20th century. Cutting
back willy-nilly on high-return investments just to make the deficit
picture look better is really foolish."
Mr Stiglitz said it was important that governments spend wisely, but
added that capital spending is vital to drive recovery. He said
Ireland’s current cutbacks show a lack of vision on how to engineer
recovery.
Mr Stiglitz said: "Your government allowed the economy to become totally
distorted, with a real estate bubble and with a banking system that was
under-regulated. I am very critical of what happened in the US, but
there are other countries that also allowed things get out of hand, and
Ireland and Iceland are among those, worse even than the US.
"To get things going again, you need to have a vision of where you want
to go. You don’t just want to get yourself back to where you were in
2007. There was something fundamentally wrong with what we were doing in
2007 – a wrong view of the balance between the market and government, a
wrong view of the direction of our society and our economy. Unless you
have a vision of where you want to go, you will be back making the same
mistakes that got us into this mess in the first place."
He said the deficit target of 3% of GDP was an artificial number, which
could lead Europe into a double-dip. "What we’re doing is setting
ourselves for a longer-term Japanese-style malaise of weak growth for an
extended period of time. It’s disturbing that people are talking about a
new normal, with unemployment of 8%-10%, which would be devastating."
See up to 10
articles a month, access email services and portfolio tools
Occasional
Reader
Read 1 article
a month
Editor's
Picks:
China goes against the grain on crops -- Rise in imports spurs
self-sufficiency doubts; China’s rice imports have also been higher than usual
this year, with the country surprising observers with big purchases in Vietnam
and elsewhere.
Ozawa to challenge Kan for PM position -- Challenge to Kan comes as
Japan struggles with surging yen; The Democratic party won a landslide victory
last September, ending decades of rule by the Liberal Democratic party. But it
has since been plagued by scandals, internal bickering and policy U-turns. Mr
Hatoyama was forced to resign after just nine months over a financial scandal.
China’s small towns are big money for PCs - - The hinterland has become
cutting edge of global market; “In early 2009, 45 per cent of the desktop
computers we sold to consumers in China were sold in what we call ‘emerging
markets’. Now it’s 70 per cent. In notebooks, emerging markets accounted for 30
per cent a year ago, and now it’s half,” says Tang Jie, general manager of
Lenovo’s consumer and channel business in China.
Ireland attacks ‘flawed’ S&P move - - Debt downgrade prompts bond sell-off;
Padhraic Garvey, head of rates strategy for developed markets at ING Financial
Markets, said: “Ireland is the chief concern in the market after Greece,
regardless of how you work out public debt.”
Overseas forays boost Spanish companies - - Multinationals profit from
investments and foreign expansion even though economy at home is moribund; At
Telefónica, for example, operations in Latin America and Europe outside Spain
generated 67 per cent of revenues and 60 per cent of operating income in the
first half of this year.
Access to the New York Times is currently free. If you are not registered, click
here
Editor's Picks:
Building a Nation of Know-Nothings - - If the lies about the president
continue to gain traction, we're all going to pay a price; Timothy Egan on his NYT blog says remember the moment: a woman with matted hair and a
shaky voice rose to express her doubts about Barack
Obama. “I have read about him,” she said, “and he’s
not — he’s an Arab.” McCain was quick to knock
down the lie. “No, ma’am,” he said, “he’s a decent
family man, a citizen.”
Despite Reform, Banks Have Room for Risky Deals - - Even with regulation,
some federally insured banks say they will continue to make speculative bets
using their own money on behalf of clients; This year, for example, several
large insurance companies approached Goldman Sachs, looking to bet that the
markets would not stay quiet. Goldman gladly took the other side of the trades,
but when the markets turned choppy in May, the firm was caught short and quickly
lost $250 million.
Key Karzai Aide in Corruption Inquiry Is Linked to C.I.A. - - An aide to
President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan being investigated for corruption is paid
by the Central Intelligence Agency, officials said, underscoring deep
contradictions in American policy there.
A High-Tech Titan Plagued by Potholes - - India, which is flooded with
software engineers, lacks skilled professionals interested in overhauling the
nation’s decaying highways, power plants and railroads; Civil engineering was
once an elite occupation in India, not only during the British colonial era of
carving roads and laying train tracks, but also long after independence as part
of the civil service. These days, though, India’s best and brightest know there
is more money and prestige in writing software for foreign customers than in
building roadways for their nation.
Obama, Mindful of Elections and Weak Reports, Holds Economic Talks - - The
president also is considering an initiative that would match public and private
investments in transportation infrastructure projects. He hinted at the idea
repeatedly, without details, during a multicity trip last week before he left on
vacation.