See Search Box
lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be
the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that
developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.
Welcome
Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and
you are in its business news section.
Standard & Poor's downgrade maybe extreme but 2 years after bank guarantee slow-motion Irish response fuels market uncertainty
By Michael Hennigan, Founder and Editor of Finfacts
Aug 26, 2010 - 6:39:56 AM
Standard & Poor's downgrade of Ireland's public debt on Tuesday maybe based
on an extreme view of the outcome of the Irish banking crisis but almost 2 years after
the State banking guarantee was issued, there remains uncertainty about the cost and
plans for the State-owned Anglo Irish Bank and against the backdrop of a fragile
international economic recovery, even the much praised efforts to correct the public finance
situation may also trigger market concerns unless plans to correct the public
finances are more than generalised aspirations.
John Corrigan, chief executive of the National Treasury Management Agency
(NTMA),
said on Wednesday that S&P's debt calculations were not in line with the
approach of the International Monetary Fund or Eurostat, the European Union's
statistics agency. S&P assumed all State capital provided to the Irish banks
were debt
while Eurostat views the €7bn provided to Bank of Ireland and AIB in 2009 as an
investment. Corrigan also said the credit rating agency did not put any value on
the property assets of the State's toxic property loans' agency, the National
Assets Management Agency (NAMA.)
However, S&P said the Irish Government will
recover €16bn from the assets over the first five years. But
it does not regard the NAMA assets as very
liquid and says it will be difficult and time consuming
for NAMA to convert them into cash. It estimates the
total cost of the banking crisis, including NAMA, will be €90bn or 58% of GDP, a
figure rejected by the NTMA, which puts the ultimate cost of Anglo Irish Bank at
€24bn, whereas S&P put it at €35bn.
The
€24bn is based on the former builders' bank being maintained as a going concern
even though its brand is junk. This estimate will likely be revised up, despite
NTMA's current stance.
In response to the
hostile official reaction, Trevor Cullinan, the
London-based lead analyst with the agency pointed out that
despite the downgrade, Ireland still had a “very strong credit
rating, and the capacity of the Government to meet its financial
commitments is still very strong”.
S&P additionally commented: “We understand that NAMA has been organised in such a way as to
keep it off the Irish government’s balance sheet under Eurostat’s accounting rules. We take a different approach
and have treated similar off-balance-sheet arrangements to support national
financial systems in other countries as direct obligations of the government.”
Ireland's rating with S&P is now at the lowest level
since 1995 and 10-year Irish bonds were trading up
22 basis points on Wednesday, to 344 basis points (3.44%)
above the benchmark German bund yield of 2.255%, having reached as high as 347
basis points during the day - - the highest spread since the euro was
launched in 1999.
NTMA plans to auction
€600m worth of bonds today.
Ratings agencies can be attacked for being the handmaidens of Wall Street
before the crisis and some assessments now are likely to be over-cautious.
However, it is ludicrous that there remains so much uncertainty about the
State's costs and the fate of Anglo Irish Bank. almost two years after the
crisis began. Why did it take so long to discover that bank paperwork supporting
big value loans, was of 'shoe-box' sole trader standard? Where again were the
auditors?
Ireland and Denmark were the only countries to
guarantee bank debt (funding from bondholders), a move that restricted options
for cleaning up the banking mess. However, other countries have responded much
more promptly to the crisis.
With uncertainty about the ultimate cost to the
State of supporting Anglo Irish Bank and the risk carried by a NAMA due to be
one of the world's big property managers, the debate about tens of billions
in State support, is parallel with a discredited government scratching around
for spending cuts of up to €3bn for 2011.
Besides there is no serious interest on the part
of the Government or Opposition in structural reforms of the systems - - with
the exceptions of changes underway at the Central Bank - - which brought
Ireland to this sorry pass.
If the international recovery stutters in coming
years, this issue of the public finances will again will fuel uncertainty.
In the short-term, there is uncertainty about the
extension of the State's bank guarantee, which will expire on Sept 30th. Last week, Central Bank
governor, Prof. Patrick Honohan, suggested it should be extended in
quarters not years.
This issue is important as the banks will have to refinance up to €30bn in
maturing debt, in coming months.
The messenger is not infallible but we could
benefit from taking a serious look in the mirror!
There is really little likelihood of that
occurring.
In a move criticized by the
Ireland’s debt management agency, Standard & Poor's cut the country’s credit
rating. “The problem is really an Irish problem…they took a very conservative
view of bad debt…now they have a very bad, bad debt and that’s exactly why their
rating is deteriorating,” Ralph Silva from Silva Research Network told CNBC: