See Search Box
lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be
the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that
developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.
Welcome
Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and
you are in its business news section.
European Bank Stress Tests: AIB and Bank of Ireland pass tests; 7 of 91 banks failed - - 5 Spanish, 1 German and 1 Greek
By Finfacts Team
Jul 23, 2010 - 4:49:03 PM
The Deutsche Bank towers in Frankfurt, seen through artist Max Bill's statue Continuity - - Durch die Statue "Kontinuität" von Max Bill
European Bank Stress Tests: The Central Bank and Financial Regulator today published the
results of a stress testing exercise carried out on AIB and Bank of Ireland and
coordinated by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS). It said the
results of the exercise demonstrate that AIB and Bank of Ireland meet the stress
requirements and do not require additional capital beyond the requirement set in
March 2010 by the Central Bank and Financial Regulator following completion of
the Prudential Capital Assessment Review (PCAR) in March. The CEBS said 7 of 91 banks failed - - 5 Spanish, 1 German and 1 Greek.
Execution of the capital plans resulting from the PCAR assessment is already
underway. Bank of Ireland has already exceeded its capital requirement and AIB
has an approved capital plan to meet the requirement by December 2010 involving
asset disposals and equity raising underwritten by the Irish government.
Commenting on the results of the European exercise, Head of Financial
Regulation at the Central Bank, Matthew Elderfield said "The stress test
results published today for Ireland’s two largest banks as part of a Europe-wide
exercise follow the Central Bank and Financial Regulator’s own stress testing
process earlier this year under our Prudential Capital Assessment Review (PCAR)
framework. The PCAR stresses were set at a severe stress level and it is
therefore consistent with our earlier exercise that the Irish banks have
achieved the target level of capital in the EU process. In our application of
the EU stress test we have, as a prudent measure, decided to apply a number of
the more demanding PCAR parameters - the Irish banks also meet the target level
of capital against this standard, but with less headroom."
He added, "These results take account of the additional capital previously
prescribed by the Central Bank under the PCAR. Bank of Ireland has already met
these targets and we continue to work with AIB as it executes its capital
raising plan to meet our year end-deadline. We are also continuing our PCAR work
with the other Irish banks and will keep the capital position of the Irish
banking sector under review, conducting further stress testing exercises in the
future to benchmark prudential capital requirements in light of market
developments."
The Central Bank said objective of the EU-wide stress test exercise was
mandated by the EU Council of Ministers of Finance (ECOFIN) and coordinated by
CEBS in cooperation with the European Central Bank, national regulators and the
EU Commission, to assess the overall resilience of the EU banking sector and the
banks’ ability to absorb further possible shocks on credit and market risks,
including sovereign risks.
"Everybody has been
surprised by the small amount of money that would need to be raised by only
seven banks," Christophe Nijdam from AlphaValue told CNBC after the results of
the EU's bank stress tests were released Friday:
The exercise was carried out on a bank-by-bank basis for a sample of 91 EU
banks from 20 EU Member States, covering at least 50% of the banking sector, in
terms of total consolidated assets, in each of the 27 EU Member States. The
exercise used commonly agreed macro-economic scenarios (benchmark and adverse)
for 2010 and 2011, in cooperation with the ECB and the European Commission.
The stress test required banks to meet a 6% Tier 1 target capital ratio. It
was conducted using country and market specific methodologies, shocks and
assumptions provided by CEBS including loan loss rates, resulting from
Probability of Default (PD) and Loss Given Default (LGD) estimates, on loan
books and market shocks to trading books. The test additionally applied stress
parameters to both banking and trading books for a sustained sovereign stress.
In completing the CEBS stress test, the Central Bank and Financial Regulator
applied higher loan loss rates to both the NAMA loans and the non-NAMA
investment and development property loans than was required by CEBS. In each of
these loan categories the PCAR loss rates were applied. This resulted in a more
demanding stress test than was prescribed by CEBS due to the specific PCAR loss
rates applied to these exposures.
Assessing the
bank stress tests, with Gavan Nolan, Markit and Simon Smith, FXPro:
Both the CEBS and PCAR exercises have subjected AIB and Bank of Ireland to
rigorous stress testing, scrutiny and challenge. While both have different
assumptions and methodologies, they apply a robust, realistic and prudent
capital standard informed by detailed analysis and by emerging best practice
internationally. Results of the CEBS stress test and the CEBS stress with the
Central Bank and Financial Regulator adjustments for NAMA and non-NAMA property
loans are shown in the table. The adjusted CEBS stress test outcomes are the
results that have been provided to CEBS.
Table 2. Valuation haircuts to sovereign debt holdings as applied in the exercise
Bloomberg said the stress tests on 91 banks took account
of bank losses only on government bonds they trade rather than
those they hold to maturity, according to a draft European
Central Bank document.
“The haircuts are applied to the trading book portfolios
only, as no default assumption was considered,” according to
a confidential document dated July 22nd and titled “EU Stress
Test Exercise: Key Messages on Methodological Issues.”
The tests assumed a loss of 23.1% on Greek
debt, 14% of Portuguese bonds, 12.3% on
Spanish debt, and 4.7% on German state debt,
according to the document obtained by Bloomberg News. UK
government bonds were subject to a 10%t haircut,
and France 5.9%.
The decision “allows banks to basically underestimate
their exposure to distressed peripheral debt,” Brown
Brothers Harriman, the New York private bank founded almost
200 years ago, said in a note to clients today. “By leaving
out stress tests on the banking book, then a true picture of
bank balance sheets will clearly not be obtained.”
The tests assume the weighted average yield on euro-area
five-year government bonds will rise to 4.6% in 2011
from 2.7% at the end of 2009. The tests also include
an increase in the yield on five-year Greek government bonds
to as much as 13.9% after “interest rate shocks,” the
document shows.
“The haircuts on government debt in the trading book
increase according to the introduction of sovereign risk,
which is modeled as an increase in government bond spreads
in line with market developments since the beginning of May
2010,” according to the document.
The EU's bank
stress tests were harder than those of the past, French Finance Minister
Christine Lagarde told CNBC Friday after the test results were released:
CEBS
The CEBS said the exercise
includes a sample of 91 European banks, representing 65% of the European market
in terms of total assets, in coordination with 20 national supervisory
authorities. It has been conducted over a 2 years horizon, until the end of
2011, under severe assumptions. The stress test focuses mainly on credit and
market risks, including the exposures to European sovereign debt. CEBS has
coordinated the exercise and conducted extensive cross-checks over the results,
which were submitted to a rigorous peer review process in order to ensure their
consistency and comparability.
The report provides details on the
scenarios, methodologies and aggregate results of the stress test exercise.
In total, aggregate impairment and trading
losses under the adverse scenario and additional sovereign shock would amount to
€566bn over the years 2010-2010.
The aggregate Tier 1 ratio, used as a
common measure of banks’ resilience to shocks, under the adverse scenario would
decrease from 10.3% in 2009 to 9.2% by the end of 2011 (compared to the
regulatory minimum of 4% and to the threshold of 6% set up for this exercise).
The aggregate results depend partly on the continued reliance on government
support for currently 38 institutions in the exercise.
The aggregate Tier 1 ratio incorporates
approximately 197bn € of government capital support provided until 1 July 2010,
which represents 1.2 percentage point of the aggregate Tier 1 ratio.
As a result of the adverse scenario
after a sovereign shock, 7 banks would see their Tier 1 capital ratios fall
below 6%.
The threshold of 6% is used as a benchmark
solely for the purpose of this stress test exercise. The CEBS said this threshold should by no
means be interpreted as a regulatory minimum. All banks that are supervised in
the EU need to have at least a regulatory minimum of 4% Tier 1 capital.
For the institutions that failed to meet
the threshold for this stress test exercise, the competent national authorities
are in close contact with these banks to assess the results of the test and
their implications, in particular in terms of need for recapitalisation.
Results of the individual banks and
statements on follow-up actions, where needed, are provided by the banks
participating in the exercise and/or their national supervisory authorities.
"We support, in particular, the transparency of this
exercise, given the specific market circumstances under which banks currently
operate. We therefore welcome the publication of banks’ individual results,
particularly their respective capital positions and loss estimates under an
adverse scenario, as well as detailed information on banks’ exposures to EU/EEA
central and local government debt," the CEBS said.
All eight major Spanish banks passed but
five of the 19 regional lenders known as 'cajas'
failed.
One German bank and
one Greek bank were the other institutions to fail
the tests. Their combined shortfall would be about
€3.5bn, according to the CEBS.
Analysts had
estimated that the exams could reveal capital
shortfalls totalling anywhere from €30bn to €90bn.
The Committee of European Banking Supervisors discusses the bank stress test methodology and the organization's conclusion about which banks are at risk: