See Search Box
lower down this column for searches of Finfacts news pages. Where there may be
the odd special character missing from an older page, it's a problem that
developed when Interactive Tools upgraded to a new content management system.
Welcome
Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and
you are in its business news section.
Cowen announces advisory panel on €500m Innovation Fund - Ireland; Half of membership on the public payroll
By Michael Hennigan, Founder and Editor of Finfacts
Jul 16, 2010 - 6:39:43 AM
Taoiseach Brian Cowen on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Monday, July 12, 2010.
Taoiseach Brian Cowen on Thursday
announced the appointment of a panel to oversee the Government’s
new €500 million Innovation Fund - Ireland. Half of the
membership is on the public payroll.
At the New York Stock Exchange on Monday,
the Taoiseach launched ‘Innovation Fund – Ireland’, a €500m fund
to support enterprise development and job creation. Cowen said
the Fund is a key pillar of the Government’s Smart Economy
strategy. As Finfacts noted on Tuesday this week (see bottom of
page), the new Fund
is just another tool in the arsenal of enterprise incentives but contrary
to the popular myth, venture capital in the United States
supports only a small number of start-ups. Both in Ireland and the US, bank credit will
continue to be the main funding source.
The target of 120,000 new jobs
from primarily university research in the next ten years, is not
supported by a credible case and most high tech firms remain
small with less than 10 employees. The response of policymakers
is to ignore evidence-based criticism and pack advisory
committees with individuals who have a professional interest in
boosting public funding.
The Taoiseach said on
Thursday: "Innovation Fund – Ireland
is a key driver of the Government’s strategy to position Ireland
as a Global Innovation Hub. The objective is to make Ireland:
the best place in Europe to turn research and knowledge into
products and services; the best place in Europe to start and
grow an innovative company; the best place to relocate or expand
and scale a small or medium-sized company; and, the best place
in Europe for research-intensive multinationals to collaborate
with each other and with clusters of small companies.
Innovation Fund –
Ireland will result in the
establishment of the European operations of a number of leading
or ‘top quartile’ international VC Fund managers in Ireland. It
is a key pillar in the Government’s strategy to make Ireland one
of the most attractive places for entrepreneurial activity and
job creation."
He said lack of finance
consistently emerges as a key impediment for innovative firms.
Successful companies like Google, Facebook and Staples, relied
on venture financing to achieve the scale necessary to become
multinational companies and provide large numbers of jobs.
Innovation Fund – Ireland is being set up to provide the same
opportunities to Irish companies.
Announcing the membership
of the advisory panel, he said: "We have lived through the
worst global recession of our lifetimes, but it is imperative
that we position Ireland so that we can take advantage of the
global upturn when it comes. We have a clear vision of what we
want to achieve for Ireland and we are building on a range of
policies introduced to make Ireland a thriving centre for
business development and employment creation. Innovation
Fund – Ireland is a key initiative
to make this happen”
The panel will be chaired by Damien Callaghan of Intel
Capital. The other members are:
Bernard Byrne, CFO AIB Bank; Martin
Kelly, Partner, IBM VC Group; Ray Nolan, Software Entrepreneur;
Bernie Cullinan – CEO Clarigen; Helen Ryan, CEO Creganna-Tactx
Medical; Dr. Hugh Brady, President UCD; Prof Peter Clinch,
Special Economic Adviser to the Taoiseach; John Corrigan, Chief
Executive, NTMA, Prof Frank Gannon, Director General, SFI; Barry
O’Leary, CEO IDA Ireland; Frank Ryan, CEO Enterprise Ireland;
Secretariat: Department of the Taoiseach
Ireland is among the world’s most
competitive locations for R&D investment, according to a
study by Mazars. The accountancy firm undertook an evaluation of
the cost of global R&D initiatives after tax and other cost
incentives in 20 countries.
Of the 20 countries examined, 8 with attractive R&D tax regimes
were analysed in depth to ascertain the most effective tax rate
for companies making R&D investment.
Of the 8 countries examined - - Australia, Canada, France,
Ireland, Israel, Netherlands, UK and the USA - Ireland had an
effective tax rate of 1%, making it the second most competitive
of these 8 countries. Israel had the most competitive effective
rate at -6%.
Noel Cunningham, Tax Partner, Mazars says changes introduced on
R&D tax credits in recent budgets have greatly enhanced the
attractiveness of investing in R&D by both Irish and
multinational companies.
“A tax computation was completed for each country to
determine the after tax cost of a given level of R&D expenditure
so as to arrive at an effective tax rate”, said Cunningham. “Israel and Ireland had the best corporation tax
rates at 11.5% and 12.5% respectively. However, Israel’s regime
provides for grants of 50% of the R&D investment whereas Ireland
provides a tax credit of 25%. This is where Israel leads the
rest of the world in terms of supporting R&D investment”.
“IDA Ireland has been successful in attracting R&D investment
to Ireland from leading multinationals. So far this year 14
companies have made R&D announcements including IBM investing
€66m in its first smarter cities technology centre which
will create 200 jobs and a €23mm investment by Analoge
Devices in Limerick. Based on our analysis, Ireland should
attract continued R&D investments to Ireland”, he said.
According to Cunningham there are also a number of critical
non-tax factors which multinationals consider when evaluating a
location for R&D investment. These include; the availability of
qualified research institutions; the education level of
available workforce; the cost and availability of resources,
facilities, equipment and materials; the proximity of the R & D
location to the multinational group’s existing operations; a
country’s intellectual property (IP) laws regarding ownership
and protection of IP and a country’s political stability.
“Ireland rates highly on all of these critical factors,
although the government’s failure to meet its Lisbon agenda
targets for 3% of GDP to be invested in Research and Development
is a cause for concern. Recent media reports have highlighted
concerns expressed by Trinity College which forecasts that the
numbers of post-doctoral research staff in the university will
fall by 67%, and postgraduate research student numbers by 33%,
in the academic year 2015-16. Clearly without a strong base of
indigenous researchers and research facilities our
attractiveness as a location for R&D investment will diminish,”
he said.
It is foolish to claim Ireland
should compete with for example Sweden and Finland, countries
which spend more than 3% of their respective GDPs on research. In contrast with Ireland, these countries have several world class companies with research competences.
The Irish international tradable
goods and services sectors are overwhelmingly dominated by
foreign firms. Their main function in Ireland is not research
e.g. the pharmaceutical/medical device sector, which is
responsible for more than 50% of Irish merchandise exports.
As public funds usually supports
about two-thirds of R&D spending, it is a recipe for monumental
waste to suggest Ireland should be spending €3bn annually
- - equivalent to 10% of tax revenues -- on the employment of
tens of thousands of researchers.
It would of course be good news
for university presidents and academics who dream of creating a
new Nokia without having to abandon the padded safety net of
public employment and pensions.
It
is important to understand that over 90% of the firms which survive are
termed 'micro firms' and never exceed more than nine employees.
High tech firms have a 25% chance of getting beyond their seventh birthday and while the survival rate
rises to about mid thirties for non-science sectors, the challenge of
generating start-ups in new growth areas as well as in domestic market sectors,
is enormous. Not only will bank credit availability not return to a reasonable
level anytime soon, growth in developed economies will be hampered by high
public debt for many years.