• In the most likely scenario, if someone ate an average amount of Irish pork each day throughout the period of the incident (90 days), 10% of which was contaminated at the highest recorded concentration of dioxins[1], the body burden[2] would increase by approximately 10%. EFSA considers this increase to be of no concern for this single event.

• In a very extreme case, if someone ate a large amount of Irish pork each day throughout the period of the incident (90 days), 100% of which was contaminated at the highest recorded concentration of dioxins, EFSA concludes that the safety margin embedded in the tolerable weekly intake (TWI [3]) would be considerably undermined. Given that the TWI has a 10-fold built in safety margin, EFSA considers that this unlikely scenario would reduce protection, but not necessarily lead to adverse health effects.

EFSA said it has studied a limited data set provided by the Commission in relation to contamination levels and has taken into account the fat content of products containing pork, as well as consumption patterns across Europe. EFSA based its statement on the assumption that exposure at these high levels only began in September 2008 and that effective measures have now been taken to remove this excessive exposure from Irish pork and pork products.

The levels of dioxins in pork and pork products will depend on the fat content, because dioxins accumulate in the fat. The longer the exposure and the higher the fat content, the more dioxins accumulate and stay in the animal’s body. In humans, once exposure ends, the body burden begins to decrease.

EFSA has considered data on fat content and different contamination levels in products containing pork that have been withdrawn from sale such as sausages and pizzas. This analysis provides risk managers with a more detailed understanding of possible exposure levels.

See the Statement of EFSA on the risks for public health due to the presence of dioxins in pork from Ireland.

Complex talks on rescue package continue - IAPP

The Irish Association of Pigmeat Processors (IAPP) today said that the rescue package being worked out to save the pigmeat processing sector and underpin its ongoing viability, against the backdrop of costs arising from the government recall of pigmeat products, is multifaceted and extremely complicated.

IAPP Director Cormac Healy said:"The complexity involved in finding a solution is linked to the nature of the total recall, and the detailed list of products concerned. The contingent liabilities arising from claims needs to be addressed in any rescue package.

"Processors want to get back into operation and to rebuild their businesses, but they can only do so if they are financially and legally equipped to do so."

Related Articles

Bookmark with:					What are these?
	digg		del.icio.us		reditt		Newsvine		stumbleUpon

© Copyright 2009 by Finfacts.com

Top of Page