The European Commission has adopted a proposal to increase the minimum rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages agreed in 1992, from 1 January 2008. Considering the need to avoid the EU system of minimum rates becoming meaningless and in line with the request of the Finance Ministers of the Member States' to come forward with this proposal, the Commission proposes to increase the minimum rates taking into account the inflation since 1992 and, therefore, restore their real value.
The majority of Member States are unaffected by this proposal as their national rates already exceed the proposed new minimum rates. However, for those Member States that will have difficulties to increase their national rates immediately transition periods, up to 2010, are proposed. Although the inflation rate is 31%, the economic and social impact of the proposal can be considered as minimal. For example, for beer, the biggest required increase in national excise duty would be of the order of 0.01 (one eurocent) on half a litre of beer, at the latest by 1 January 2010.
"The minimum rates are the cornerstone of the EU excise duty system which was agreed in 1992 as the minimum necessary for the functioning of the internal market" said Taxation and Customs Union Commissioner Lαszlσ Kovαcs. "Revalorising the minimum rates is a necessary step to restore the position to that which was agreed in 1992."
Increasing the minimum rates and providing transitional periods
The proposal foresees:
- Revalorisation of the minimum rates in line with inflation from 1993 to 2005, (which is in the order of 31% ) to take effect from 1 January 2008;
- transitional periods up to 1 January 2010 for those Member States that may have difficulties in increasing their national rates by 1 January 2008 to meet the revalorised minima.
More specifically, for those Member States that are required to increase their national rates by more than 10% but less than 20%, a transitional period to 1 January 2009 is proposed; for those Member States that are required to increase their national rates by more than 20%, a transitional period to 1 January 2010 is proposed.
The proposal will increase the minimum rates as shown in the following table:
|
Product |
Rate expressed
Per |
Present minimum rate |
Minimum duty on typical item based on present rate |
Indexed minimum rate on
31/12/2005
(present rate x 1.31) |
Minimum duty on typical item based on indexed rate |
|
Wine (Still and sparkling) |
Hectolitre |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Beer |
Hectolitre and per degree Plato
or
Hectolitre and per % of alcohol by volume |
0.748
or
1.87 |
0.0467
half litre of beer at 5% vol (or 12.5 ° Plato) |
0.98
or
2.45 |
0.0612
half litre of beer at 5% vol (or 12.5 ° Plato) |
|
Intermediate products (e.g. fortified wines such as port wines, sherry etc ) |
Hectolitre |
45 |
0.315
70cl bottle |
59 |
0.413
70cl bottle |
|
Ethyl alcohol and spirit drinks |
Hectolitre of pure alcohol (100 % by volume) |
550 |
1.54
70cl bottle at 40% vol |
720 |
2.017
70cl bottle at 40% vol |
Which effect on what type of product in what country?
The economic and social impact of the proposal can be considered as minimal. For example, for beer, this would have as a consequence that the Member States most affected would have to increase their national excise duty by 0.01 (one eurocent) on half a litre of beer, at the latest by 1 January 2010. For the consumer, and based on subsequent retail price adjustments, this increase is likely to represent less than the typical EU annual inflation rate.
In addition, as far as SME are concerned, provisions already exist whereby small businesses (breweries and distilleries) can benefit from reduced rates, however, that is a matter for the Member States concerned to determine.
The national rates already applied by the majority of Member States are in excess of the proposed revalorised minima and consequently no action will be required by them.
However, the national rates currently applied in several Member States are below the proposed revalorised minima and consequently they will be required to increase their national rates, as follows:
BEER
|
Member State |
Current national rate |
% increase required to meet new minimum rate
0.98 / ° Plato or 2.45 / % vol |
Additional duty in on a half litre of beer at 5 % vol (or 12.5° Plato) |
|
Per degree Plato |
Per % of alcohol by volume |
|
Malta |
0.746 |
|
31.3% |
0.0145 |
|
Latvia |
|
1.87 |
31% |
0.0144 |
|
Germany |
0.787 |
|
24.5% |
0.0120 |
|
Luxembourg |
0.7933 |
|
23.5% |
0.0116 |
|
Czech Republic |
0.81 |
|
20.9% |
0.0105 |
|
Lithuania |
|
2.03 |
20.6% |
0.0104 |
|
Spain |
0.91 |
|
7.7% |
0.0043 |
INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS[1]
|
Member State |
Current national rate |
% increase required to meet new minimum rate 59/hl |
Additional duty in on a 70cl bottle |
|
Greece |
45.00 |
31% |
0.0976 |
|
Cyprus |
45.89 |
28.5% |
0.0915 |
|
Malta |
46.57 |
26.6% |
0.0867 |
|
Portugal |
54.57 |
8.1% |
0.0309 |
|
Spain |
55.53 |
6.2% |
0.0241 |
ALCOHOL AND SPIRIT DRINKS
|
Member State |
Current national rate |
% increase required to meet new minimum rate 720/hl 100% vol |
Additional duty in on a 70cl bottle at 40 % vol |
|
Cyprus |
610.71 |
17.9% |
0.31 |
|
Slovenia |
695.14 |
3.6% |
0.07 |
Background
Council Directive 92/84/EEC on the approximation of the rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages sets down the minimum rates as shown in the above table. Above these minima Member States are free to set their national rates at levels they consider appropriate. The Directive also provides that periodic reviews of the minimum rates are carried out by the Commission. In this respect, the Commission presented its report on 26 May 2004 for discussion in the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and Council. The report concluded, among other things, that in order to maintain the real value of the minimum excise duty rates, Member States could consider a re-valorisation and so avoid them becoming meaningless over time. In the discussions that followed, the Council, on 12 April 2005, called on the Commission to come forward with a proposal to adjust the minimum rates in order to avoid a fall in their real value and to provide transitional periods for those Member States who may have difficulties in increasing their rates.
EU Report
See: Taxes on alcohol in EU and Global Consumption Rankings
