Analysis/Comment Dr. Peter Morici: Lagarde makes sense for the IMF
By Professor Peter Morici
May 26, 2011 - 1:00 AM
Christine Lagarde, French finance minister, with Michael Noonan, Irish finance minister, Brussels, May 17, 2011. She may become the first woman to head the IMF. In 2008, an internal report said harassment of women was common at the Fund's headquarters in Washington DC, according to The New York Times
Dr. Peter Morici: France's Finance
Minister Christine Lagarde makes good sense to head the International Monetary
Fund (IMF). She is experienced and well qualified, and for now, leadership of
the IMF should be kept in European hands.
The IMF is one of three institutions established after World War II to manage
government policies affecting global commerce and foster market-based trade and
investment flows. These include the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade,
which evolved into the World Trade Organization in 1995; the International
Monetary Fund; and the World Bank.
The WTO and IMF establish rules for tariffs and other government policies
affecting trade in goods and services, foreign investment, and exchange rates
among currencies. The World Bank was established to provide long term financial
and technical assistance to developing countries.
After World War II, the Americans got the head of the World Bank and the
Europeans the IMF. At the WTO, established in 1995, the top spot is open to all
comers, and a Thai, Supachai Panitchpakdi, led the organization from 2002 to
The Asian push for an opportunity to lead the IMF or World Bank makes some
sense. Led by China and India, Asia is experiencing astonishing growth; however,
the means are as important as the ends. By their behavior, China and a few other
large Asian governments, which would have principle weight in selecting an Asian
to lead the IMF, have shown they are not qualified to exert such influence.
Quite simply, a leader picked by Asia's larger high performing economies likely
would be bad for free markets and the long term progress of the global economy,
because so much of Asia's growth has been fostered by violating the norms of
free trade and market determined exchange rates laid out in the rules and
prescriptions for government policy in WTO and IMF agreements.
Those nations have too often systematically blocked western products from their
markets. They have required foreign businesses to locate production inside their
borders to sell in those markets, imposed on foreign investors technology
transfer and other requirements offensive to free markets, and maintained
significantly undervalued currencies or otherwise regulated exchange rate
transactions to gain unfair advantage over western competitors.
When these economies were small it did not matter much. But huge trade surpluses
of Asian countries like China-who has been particularly obstinate, intransigent
and cynical about reforming its trade and exchange rate regime-have caused
destructive imbalances in demand between Asia and the West.
Economists, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Noble prize
winner Paul Krugman, have tagged China's exchange rate policies for keeping
western economies from recovering from the Great Recession and keeping
unemployment too high in the United States and Europe.
Now western governments must exercise excessive Keynesianism, and run budget
deficits so large as to put their long term financial viability in jeopardy,
just to keep their economies growing slowly.
Also, the financial sector in the United States and Europe is in much need of
further reform but many banks are too stressed in the current environment of
misaligned exchange rates and slow growth for western governments to push reform
If the Asians want to lead in making and enforcing the rules, perhaps they
should try playing by the rules. That begins with the bullies in Beijing and
other lesser mercantilists around Asia backing off protectionist exchange rate
policies and genuinely opening their markets to western goods and services.
Asian exchange rates are wildly out of adjustment-most Asian currencies must be
permitted to rise in value-consistent with balanced trade and investment flows
for the global economy to get back on track.
The two principle challenges before the IMF are accomplishing exchange rate
reform-especially in Asia-and dealing with the sovereign debt crises in Greece
and Portugal that could spread elsewhere.
Christine Lagarde is a proven leader and accomplished financial minister. The
euro has been managed by markets, not European Central Bank intervention, thanks
to the commitment of Lagarde and other European leaders to market determined
exchange rates, even when that commitment was inconvenient. Lagarde is well
versed in the problems besetting Greece and other poorer EU countries.
Were the Asians permitted to capture the IMF bureaucracy, the IMF's role could
easily morph into justifying and supporting protectionist exchange rate policies
that greatly impede the progress of the global economy outside Asia.
Christine Lagarde makes sense for the IMF. A candidate endorsed by China and
other Asian mercantilist doesn't.
IMF's Lipsky on Eurozone Debt & IMF's Future and Lagarde:
Professor, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland,
Battling for IMF's Top Job: Simon Warner, Head of Macro Markets at AMP Capital says Christine Legarde is a perfect candidate for IMF's top job as the fund's priority for the next ten years is to fix the euro-zone's debt problems: