| Click for the Finfacts Ireland Portal Homepage |

Finfacts Business News Centre

News Main Page 
 
 News
 Irish
 European
 International
 Asia-Pacific Business Week
 
 Analysis/Comment

RSS FEED


How to use our RSS feed

 
Web Finfacts

Welcome

Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and you are in its business news section.

We provide access to live business television and business related videos from: Bloomberg TV; The Wall Street Journal; CNBC and the Financial Times. Click image:

Links

Finfacts Homepage

Global News

Bloomberg News

CNN Money

Cnet Tech News

Newspapers

Irish Independent

Irish Times

Irish Examiner

New York Times

Financial Times

Technology News

 

Feedback

 

Search

Analysis/Comment Last Updated: Dec 19th, 2007 - 13:17:15


Dr Peter Morici: The Washington Dance on Trade
By Professor Peter Morici, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland
Feb 6, 2007, 07:02

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Peter Morici is an economist and professor at the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland. He is a recognized expert on international economics, industrial policy and macroeconomics. Prior to joining the university, he served as director of the Office of Economics at the US International Trade Commission.
US Trade Representative Sue Schwab has announced the United States is filing a complaint with the World Trade Organization against China’s subsidies aimed at boosting exports and discouraging imports. While this is welcome news, it remains to be seen whether this offers American workers victimized by Chinese mercantilism any real relief.
 
  
The subsidies targeted by the Bush Administration include various corporate income, value-added and employment tax exemptions, and low interest loans awarded by China’s state-directed banks.   
 
According to Ambassador Schwab, these programs benefit some 60 percent of China’s manufactured exports. Hence, it is no coincidence that China accounts for more than a third of the U.S. trade deficit and a larger share than either petroleum or automotive products.  

Anyone knowledgeable about the nature and consequences of these subsidies has to wonder: Why it has taken the Bush Administration so long for it to act? Why has it chosen the WTO when quicker forms of relief are available? 
 
Export subsidies are considered among the most egregious violations of WTO rules and carry the harshest penalties. WTO rules permit the United States to impose, unilaterally, countervailing duties on subsidized products from China to neutralize the effects of these practices. 
 
Unfortunately, the Reagan Administration suspended application of U.S. countervailing duty laws on imports from non-market economies in 1984. Much has changed since then, and Russia, China, and other former Communist economies are generally integrated into global markets. Their products should have to compete by the same rules as those, for example, made in Japan or the European Union.   
 
The Bush Administration is only now considering a change in policy but has not yet taken action. It is no coincidence that U.S. multinationals with manufacturing operations in China lobby against taking strong action against Chinese mercantilism.   
  
The history of WTO disputes addressing broad subsidies, like tax holidays and bank credit, indicate the U.S. complaint will likely take years to resolve. China will have many options to reconfigure these practices before ultimately relinquishing them. 
 
Practically speaking, asking the WTO to address Chinese export subsidies instead of applying U.S. countervailing duty laws would be like calling the United Nations to coordinate clean up after Hurricane Katrina instead of dispatching the Federal Emergency Management Administration. However, after five years of bungling issues like nuclear proliferation, global warming and the war in Iraq, none of us should be too surprised by inexplicable behavior at the Bush White House on a foreign policy issue. 

Even more problematic, the complaint to the WTO does not mention that China provides subsidies to100 percent of its exports by persistently buying dollars in currency markets to ensure a low value for the yuan against the dollar.  This despite the facts that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke singled out currency subsidies during his recent trip to China and that China could replace all the tax and credit subsidies cited in the WTO complaint by stepping up its currency market intervention a notch. 
 
In the last Congress, a bipartisan bill sponsored by Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Tim Ryan (D-OH) was offered that would require the Administration to apply the countervailing duty law to subsidies in non-market economies like China, and specifically enumerates manipulated currencies as actionable under the law. With the Republicans in charge, Hunter-Ryan languished. 
 
Now the Democrats are in control, and we have seen their priorities. The House has already voted on a minimum wage bill, but Hunter-Ryan is not yet on the docket.  In Senate hearings, Democrats put Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson on the hot seat on trade with China but have abstained from any substantive measures to force Administration action. 
 
Instead, the Democratic congressional leadership holds hostage renewal of the President’s authority to negotiate trade agreements. They want assurances labor and environment standards will be written into these deals. As with subsidies, the United States already has latitude to take action against products made with child workers and in many polluting factories but has chosen not to act.  Writing those issues into trade agreements won’t help if the person in the White House won’t enforce U.S. rights. 
 
The dirty little secret in Washington is that Democrats have lots of corporate friends in Hollywood, who are more interested in intellectual property issues than subsidies that harm U.S. manufacturers, and on Wall Street, who earn big profits from Chinese protectionism. 
  
So far, the Democrats have talked a good game but have offered working Americans no real action on trade issues. 
 
Republicans and Democrats may dance to different tunes but when the music stops, it is still the worker gored by Chinese subsidizes who is left without a chair.

Peter Morici
Professor
Robert H. Smith School of Business
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742-1815
703 549 4338
cell 703 618 4338

pmorici@rhsmith.umd.edu
http://www.smith.umd.edu/lbpp/faculty/morici.html
http://www.smith.umd.edu/faculty/pmorici/cv_pmorici.htm 


© Copyright 2007 by Finfacts.com

Top of Page

Analysis/Comment
Latest Headlines
Dr. Peter Morici: The Federal Reserve needs more than a new Communications Strategy
The Irish Mind and the Knowledge Economy: Should we bank everything on fuzzy leprechaunic political dreams?
Dr. Peter Morici: Why the US Trade Deficit matters?
Dr. Peter Morici: US Recession Watch, the Jobs Report and Fed Policy
Dr. Peter Morici: Business as Usual: the Energy Bill, Subprime Mess, and Recession Watch
Dr. Peter Morici: China’s Dragon does not flinch and Bernanke’s Toothless Dog
Cabinet decision to defer Irish ministerial pay hikes until 2009 seen as empty gesture after weeks of controversy
Dr. Peter Morici: President Bush's Mortgage Program and Rumblings from Europe about the Dollar
Dr. Peter Morici: Avoiding a US Recession
Christmas Fear and a proposed German Minimum Wage - Prof Hans-Werner Sinn
Nine months after ISEQ record highs, Irish shares likely to underperform other markets for sometime
Dr. Peter Morici: An Emergency Interest Rate Cut? and The Week Ahead: Forecasts for the Weeks of November 26 and December 3 (preliminary)
Germany: How the Upswing Came About - Six Hypotheses - - Prof. Hans-Werner Sinn
Dr. Peter Morici: The Limits of US Federal Reserve Policy
Dr. Peter Morici: US Stock Prices and the Trade Deficit; Forecasts for the Weeks of November 12 and November 19
Dr. Peter Morici: US Economy adds 166,000 employees in October; While ranks of the Self Employed fall: Credit Crisis grows, Bernanke’s credibility suffers
Dr. Peter Morici: The Fed's Misstep, and Forecasts for the Weeks of November 5 and November 1
Dr. Peter Morici: The Falling US Dollar and the Stubborn US Trade Deficit
Where is the Outrage? Gombeenism thrives at home while in Paris, OECD staff work on proposals for Irish public service reform
Dr. Peter Morici: Why Bernanke should Cut Rates and Forecasts for the Weeks of October 22 and October 29