| Click for the Finfacts Ireland Portal Homepage |

Finfacts Business News Centre

News Main Page 
 
 News
 Irish
 European
 International
 Asia-Pacific Business Week
 
 Analysis/Comment

RSS FEED


How to use our RSS feed

 
Web Finfacts

Welcome

Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and you are in its business news section.

We provide access to live business television and business related videos from: Bloomberg TV; The Wall Street Journal; CNBC and the Financial Times. Click image:

Links

Finfacts Homepage

Global News

Bloomberg News

CNN Money

Cnet Tech News

Newspapers

Irish Independent

Irish Times

Irish Examiner

New York Times

Financial Times

Technology News

 

Feedback

 

Search

News : International Last Updated: Dec 19th, 2007 - 13:17:15


Study shows that foreign companies sued in the US are more likely to lose than their American counterparts
By Finfacts Team
Dec 13, 2006, 10:14

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
Dr. Utpal Bhattacharya
Non-US public companies sued in the US are more likely to lose than their American counterparts of similar size facing similar claims, a study of 3,000 corporate defendants has found.

The study says that the mere announcement of a US lawsuit also hits non-US companies far harder.

On average, their value fell $930,000 on the day of the announcement compared with $366,000 for US firms, according to the study led by Utpal Bhattacharya, a finance professor at Indiana University's Kelley School of Business.

In an abstract, the authors say:

Using a comprehensive sample of 2,361 public U.S. corporate defendants and 715 public foreign corporate defendants in U.S. federal courts in the period 1995-2000, we find that the market reaction at the announcement of a U.S. federal lawsuit is less negative for U.S. corporate defendants. We find that this market reaction is rational; U.S. firms are less likely to lose than foreign firms controlling for year, industry, type of litigation, size and profitability. This may still reflect a sample selection bias. We control for this bias, and the results remain. We thus cannot rule out that U.S. firms have a home court advantage in U.S. federal courts.

The apparent “home court advantage” in the study is a risk factor for foreign firms doing business in the US. As the Democratic Party, which is strongly supported by tort lawyers,  will take control of Congress in January, tort reform will not gain much traction. Republican support for tort reform is viewed as pro-business and anti-consumer by Democrats.

“If it’s a foreign firm that gets sued, they lose far more often and they lose higher dollar amounts,” Professor Bhattacharya said. “Foreign firms don’t think they get a fair shake in US courts.” 

He said the companies studied were spread across the globe.

The study, co-authored by Bruce Haslem and Neal Galpin, also reveals that more non-US firms were becoming entangled in the US legal system.

In 1995, non-US firms made up 20 per cent of the public company defendants. By the end of the study period, their share had risen to 29 per cent.

Some non-US companies may choose to fight lawsuits that US companies would opt to settle.

The authors say that the most comprehensive estimates of tort liability direct costs come from a consulting firm, Tillinghast-Towers Perrin. Their 2003 report estimates a tort cost of $233 billion in the U.S. in 2002 (2.23% of US GDP). This has increased more than hundredfold from $1.8 billion in 1950 (0.61% of U.S. GDP). In Italy and Germany, the next two closest countries in terms of tort costs, tort costs were 1.7% and 1.3% of GDP respectively in 2000 (page 20, The Economics of U.S. Tort Liability: A Primer, October 2003.)

The study begins as follows:

The Loewen Corporation, a small Canadian firm that runs a funeral home chain, was sued by Jerry O’Keefe in the state of Mississippi in 1995. It seemed like a routine contract squabble.

The value of the enterprises at stake was estimated to be a mere USD 8.5 million. Yet, a percentage fee trial lawyer convinced a Mississippi jury to award USD 100 million and USD 400 million as compensatory and punitive damages respectively. These amounts would have wiped out the small firm’s net worth. A state judge refused to lower or set aside this verdict. The Mississippi Supreme Court asked for a bond of USD 625 million if the case was to be appealed. Loewen Corporation settled for USD 100 million. Its stock crashed from USD 41 to USD 8, and it almost became bankrupt.

The global nature of this case is not unusual. As globalization progresses, cross-border corporate lawsuits, where the plaintiff is from country A and the defendant is from country B, are becoming more frequent. The large tort award, also, is not unusual. Tort awards are much higher in the U.S. than in other countries. The presence of a percentage-fee trial lawyer in this international case, also, is not unusual. U.S. trial lawyers are globalizing their industry. What is unusual in this case is the crude appeal to patriotism that the plaintiff’s lawyers made. Walter Olson, covering this case for the Wall Street Journal of February 14, 1996, in an article titled “A Small Canadian Firm Meets the American Tort Monster,” analyzed the strategies of Mr. O’ Keefe’s lawyer. The ‘dump on outsiders’ strategy was particularly effective. It was mentioned in the closing arguments that Mr. O’Keefe “fought for his country” and was now willing to “stand up for America” by suing this rich, foreign company.


© Copyright 2007 by Finfacts.com

Top of Page

International
Latest Headlines
Markets News Wednesday: Stocks deep in red ink across the globe: Asia-Pacific and Europe slump following grim day in New York
Apple launches MacBook Air - the world’s thinnest notebook
Europe suffered a slowdown in labour productivity in 2007; Rich countries face struggle to achieve rises in living standards
Wednesday Newspaper Review - Irish Business News and International Stories
Intel reports 51% rise in Q4 2007 net income but cautious outlook for 2008 sends shares plunging 14% in after-hours trading
Markets News Afternoon: Citi rains heavily on markets in Europe and US - Dublin plunges almost 4%
US retail sales fell in December signalling that consumer spending is under strain; Producer/Wholesale prices rose 6.3% in 2007 - the highest since 1981
Citigroup reported Q4 2007 loss of $9.83 billion; Write-downs and increased credit costs were a massive $22.2 billion
Markets News Tuesday: Citi bad news awaited; Markets fall in Asia-Pacific and Europe; Dollar up from near record low against Euro; Gold price over $900
Hong Kong and Singapore again head Index of Economic Freedom; Ireland gets third ranking
Tuesday Newspaper Review - Irish Business News and International Stories
US Hedge Fund Index shows return of 11.15% in 2007 - More than double the S&P 500 performance
Markets News Afternoon: Stocks rally in US and Europe boosted by positive fourth quarter data from IBM and SAP
IBM reports strong fourth quarter preliminary earnings boosted by Asia, Europe and Emerging Countries
Markets News Monday: Start of US fourth quarter earnings season has investors worried about how banks and brokerages have performed
Monday Newspaper Review - Irish Business News and International Stories
US study says Environmental Factors shaping New Global Economy
Markets News Afternoon: Report say Merrill Lynch will announce $15bn loss next week; Stocks down in US and Europe - Dublin market up; Gold tops $900
US trade deficit increased to $63.1 billion in November
OECD Composite Leading Indicators signal a downswing in all major OECD economies